From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>,
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Patch review/application process
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:55:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vcr3ehyg.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sjm74z36.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1932 bytes --]
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:55:09 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:28:45 -0300, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> > Maybe you can tag those patches as "notmuch::reviewed" using nmbug? [1]
> > My idea is that
> >
> > notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and tag:notmuch::reviewed
> >
> > should give a kind of consensus set of "ready to go" patch sets.
>
> Don't forget notmuch::applied, which I think is actually one of the most
> important. Review is easy to see by looking at the patch thread. Being
> able to easily find which patches have not yet been applied to master is
> what I'm most looking forward to.
Jamie knows this from IRC, but I have been using "notmuch::pushed" for
this.
One thing I think we need to clarify a bit is are we tagging whole
threads or individual messages in the database. Because of the way
notmuch search works, I had been tagging whole threads with
notmuch::pushed (effectively to "mute" them) in the search
notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and \
not tag:notmuch::pushed
This is a bit aesthetically unappealing, anad every time someone replies
to a thread it is effectively unmuted.
Since we don't have thread tagging yet (where e.g. tags are
automagically applied to new messages I was thinking it might work have
a tag like "notmuch::todo" and something like the following workflow
(for patches)
initially tag +notmuch::patch +notmuch::todo
then when we "dispose" of the patch somehow, remove the notmuch::todo tag and
replace with
notmuch::pushed
notmuch::obsolete
or...
Then we could do e.g.
notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and tag:notmuch::todo and tag:notmuch::reviewed
to get an "integrators queue" (Well, the more like an unordered pile
than a queue. One problem at a time).
David
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 315 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-25 20:42 Patch review/application process Daniel Schoepe
2011-10-25 23:16 ` David Bremner
2011-10-26 18:29 ` Jani Nikula
2011-10-26 18:55 ` Daniel Schoepe
2011-11-01 14:28 ` David Bremner
2011-11-01 15:55 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2011-11-01 19:55 ` David Bremner [this message]
2011-11-01 21:27 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2011-11-01 23:22 ` David Bremner
2011-11-01 23:43 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2011-11-02 15:49 ` Philip Hands
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vcr3ehyg.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca \
--to=david@tethera.net \
--cc=daniel@schoepe.org \
--cc=jrollins@finestructure.net \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).