From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A43431FD0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:04:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id RtkWQJU1MHOv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEAEF431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zancas.localnet
	(fctnnbsc36w-156034079193.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net
	[156.34.79.193]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBIC4Xwg012126
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:04:33 -0400
Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1RcFTk-0002EB-Qn; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:04:32 -0400
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: "Notmuch Mail" <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?Q29kZSBTdHlsZSBCaWtlc2hlZCAxL246IEJyZWFrIGJlZm9yZSBC?=
 =?UTF-8?B?cmFjZSBvciBCcmFjZSBiZWZvcmUgQnJlYWs/IA==?=
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+103~gd823dc2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:04:32 -0400
Message-ID: <87vcpeaxwv.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:04:35 -0000


In id:"1324135695-15487-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net" we started
discussing the use of uncrustify (or some equivalent tool) to enforce
code style. In order for this to work, we would need to be a bit more
rigid about style.

So my sunday morning bikeshed-bait is do we want 

if (...) {
}

or 

if (...) 
{
}

(and similarly for 'switch', 'for', 'while')

If I look at a small sample of Carl's original code it seems like the
former is more typical. But I might be biased because that is what I
prefer.

d