From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A43431FD0 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:04:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RtkWQJU1MHOv for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:04:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEAEF431FB6 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:04:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034079193.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.79.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBIC4Xwg012126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:04:33 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RcFTk-0002EB-Qn; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:04:32 -0400 From: David Bremner To: "Notmuch Mail" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?Q29kZSBTdHlsZSBCaWtlc2hlZCAxL246IEJyZWFrIGJlZm9yZSBC?= =?UTF-8?B?cmFjZSBvciBCcmFjZSBiZWZvcmUgQnJlYWs/IA==?= User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+103~gd823dc2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:04:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87vcpeaxwv.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:04:35 -0000 In id:"1324135695-15487-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net" we started discussing the use of uncrustify (or some equivalent tool) to enforce code style. In order for this to work, we would need to be a bit more rigid about style. So my sunday morning bikeshed-bait is do we want if (...) { } or if (...) { } (and similarly for 'switch', 'for', 'while') If I look at a small sample of Carl's original code it seems like the former is more typical. But I might be biased because that is what I prefer. d