From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE9D431FB6 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:27:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FAVdjE8hSMeX for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE969431FAE for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id A892E66E0166; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:27:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (m16.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.115.116]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FC366E00D2; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAD562E7; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:27:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Peter Wang , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers In-Reply-To: <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+54~ga0426dc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:27:23 -0700 Message-ID: <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:27:27 -0000 --=-=-= On Sat, Jun 23 2012, Peter Wang wrote: > Output Reply-To headers when present in a message. > These were missing in text and json output formats. I don't see why the Reply-To header is needed, given that we are constructing reply templates, but I guess if someone thinks it's needed I don't see much harm in including it. I didn't test it, but it looks ok to me. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP85v7AAoJEO00zqvie6q8Q/cQAJGFSB6asxk0YQdFnVeih2Uf Caa4VrKlZm+atAqZisKi0cKC1Plh/C1louL2Z751Vr/loX9CQOaW408gEke/3B8L /S2r/oQITAtAPkLfJj7vrJN0ngN/3ULFnXUnXAmCK9Scc/OgDNY1JFURe+D+cClq ct3war74JWK8Oojy0+MqQS6gv36fhsypxTvu3cBy5nVXkxfRTy72B0OMBICUbIRS /cD2Kr6PO97kM9ZqARjN1o77MlOZSwpn3Z7G4hMDqjMGGGthRHgyU8scmjM1BTjV 4HPfSQ8Bd/OkK19VmOBnHIgSomnZSrdThLLl71JAfFsjhivcBLw2qx4galcaAJEy OR28VRx4GeBuvjWkxXaXEy+2+NFqZ02JthTyZQ3Jsb3E+v8C3JDRhReFUHR5T4V0 Ff49wG19605Jip2kwoWMcNmiAoxrLrgzoCU1s8BgtrED2JoxYuzX5ifQXFGy3b4+ sMua0pWhWqh+y9EnKyagsxY7Y7/FAO/PV5a6smWiguepvpiN8TgahZBbUvnkZTRF pNKFFOCIADMiNJZMkPVyHmgo0jTeevIjeRO4VmxptrBwBo3/MsNBSXoKbFSSg+dY qleoYtRVeDLUt6RXUtMmTBMwXvGJ3M1E+QFq+mPXFodLERQ8oKUVy5Mpb/WjBjul wEgaZxyegb0bIm0PfLxM =HoEm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--