From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3597F431FB6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:04:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gYayqiYhehBS for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:04:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106B9431FAF for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so11920985pbb.26 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=CQcx8vutOlm/goP0IebA+E6LX+93PuGtSURmxS/hNec=; b=W9i9z9Pv+3Ffk56ygv0RVrUbjZDUdNdyog+3Png/enIEXc6qMsxJk2xC0ATDjV+6yN fyKZLieDFVwHYIWEDlCN+mRjoa25/HaM+vq7xeczk6I59AeBWLVJ5R6Z6TJblbro8MvC /NpkGVBx88PEhrwXSr0Zehks7YCjzHYFJSqJG+aT51mnxRsnJ6OgjDvCadsp9y2aXZf0 Sq94GskHbuG2bkuuQgS4UfOUirOhhO5Z3yE3O33XmZyLHgW7bpfnneSoxCkyXAJVItze zPnkKTCNFzGroGouSPGMFpS6GaXUf0J7VXBVAFMc01EDnRSTbfNmHuhKxSngMlmRf5rX mnYg== Received: by 10.68.138.133 with SMTP id qq5mr47693826pbb.86.1346785443962; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cl-512.phx-01.us.sixxs.net. [2001:1938:81:1ff::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sj5sm12754200pbc.30.2012.09.04.12.04.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Svend Sorensen To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1 In-Reply-To: References: <87ipcz9aro.fsf@ciffer.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:04:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87vcfta9un.fsf@finch.dhcp4.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkKZuPT5U0MVXA1qiPaJbPVtSGLIETX4W/Hdxf1R2ZCS4x0TanYeSS5kadUvYcGw73BdbX+ X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:04:06 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > On Fri, Aug 03 2012, Svend Sorensen wrote: > >> >> I was also getting an error about gnus-inhibit-images when running emacs >> 24. Adding (require 'gnus-art) to my emacs config fixed the problem. > > Where is your emacs24 from? From Debian sid? I was using the emacs-snapshot package on Debian squeeze when I ran into this problem. I am now using the emacs-snapshot package on Debian testing (wheezy). http://emacs.naquadah.org/ Svend > David has some gnus-inhibit-images related tests failing on his > system and he is using emacs24 from debian sid. My > gnus-inhibit-images related emacs24 tests don't fail (I've compiled > emacs 24.1 & emacs 24.2 from source). Also buildbot at > http://notmuch.hocat.ca/builders/master-emacs24/builds/173 > have now successful build (we assume it uses emacs24 from gentoo > -- until Tom verifies this). > >> >> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/008405.html >> >> Svend > > Tomi