From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEA5431FBF for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:44:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHwBKAI7g-ma for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BBD9431FBD for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1USnGg-0006L2-GX; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:44:46 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1USnGa-0005hD-IT; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:44:40 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Simonas Kazlauskas , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Compiling fails In-Reply-To: <20130418102507.GA23688@godbox> References: <20130418102507.GA23688@godbox> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+73~g1c450ec (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:44:40 -0300 Message-ID: <87vc7kqd07.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:44:52 -0000 Simonas Kazlauskas writes: > Of course `#pragma GCC` has to mean something and might be a reason why > compiling with `CXX=clang++` fails. Yep. clang is not currently supported. I'm not sure how difficult it would be to get working. d