From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218816DE0B29 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:25:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.037 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LzJmrrPRvcmG for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:25:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0226DE0AC2 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:25:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYEqW-00066I-EN; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:25:52 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 5000 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:25:08 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Stanislav Ochotnicky , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Boomerang-like additions? In-Reply-To: <87ziuwyb7f.fsf@sochotnicky.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87ziuwyb7f.fsf@sochotnicky.usersys.redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+5~gca076ce (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:25:08 -0400 Message-ID: <87vb5fla97.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:25:20 -0000 Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: > Heya folks, > > I recently stumbled on http://www.boomeranggmail.com/ > > It does have some nifty features (like archiving email > until later point, or only if nobody replies until certain date). Some > of them seem like they should be fairly easy to script. > > What I could imagine without too much issues: > * Decide on tag format > * start with boom > * optional "only if no replies": _NR > * date in format: _YYYYMMDD > * optional time: _MMHH > * a cron job looking at all threads with "boom" and deciding if it's > time to return > > I looked at archives and didn't find anything. Has anyone tried to do > this? I don't want to do NiH :-) It sounds related (although maybe not exactly the same as) "snoozing" mail. That has been discussed on list a bit; "nevermore" includes an implementation that could probably be borrowed, for example. d