From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FC96DE0F51 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:52:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.309, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xOeWeH26B7nF for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F026DE0F1C for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:52:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: 92.169.116.19 Received: from bababa (lfbn-1-4117-19.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.116.19]) (Authenticated sender: pierre@atlas.engineer) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29E95240007; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:52:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Reply inline in notmuch-show buffer, "mu4e-conversation style" In-Reply-To: References: <877ecvb0q7.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <877ecvm05y.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tvffqwp0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a7gyb06w.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:52:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9zm9ix2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:52:31 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Edmondson writes: > How? Don't I still have to hit one key? No, you just start writing at the end of the buffer, this area is then marked as writable. >> - No need to play with buffers to display both the thread and the compos= ition. > > If a thread is any length, I will want to split the window to show older > mail while I'm writing my comments at the bottom of the thread. So there > might only be one buffer, but two windows, so I'm not sure of the > benefit. True. But if the thread is not that long, or if we only want to look at the last thread, then we don't need to. With a separate buffer, we always have to play with the buffers to display them side by side, for inst= ance. > Well, this presumes a particular workflow and set of mail > clients. Whether it's a good idea to top post without the bottom is > debatable, I think. I'm confused: can it be top-posting if there is no citation? Citations don't offer much guarantee in terms of data integrity. If someone wants to read the previous message, they should open the previous message, regardless of the workflow / client I think. All this can be made optional and configurable. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlyt2PkACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9uewf/XKoQ5BZLegFexQioazkmPqanaDTB7VK+bIGK7hFsnnB8Zxta+vFx5pfJ NU4HW8/euCv7lh1/RdjUoO7JRpb/2AgutoyyxuqglTElY+FCmHkkl10yfJm+Hz/A ZeTau2tNCuunSp2Y9TDmTdYTedyZQ1+kSnFITt3wmAoaat2R2QHHj3n9EVBn8r1P RyUN4idFh3I4nkpN0znypY7jXs5iETsd+YhZI9IwCaae1hHje2zCyGRP6Bo8VGaQ 0sF819OrHB8MSV4fLKrTjGXgRM46RNgz+pK8paFwWHQle7hCziDlZkoHffQG5yL1 1rlQnqUf+goN/zKy/DEi/c9gtQeKlQ== =mpaI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--