On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:29:55 -0400, Nelson Elhage wrote: > Hm. You're probably right that it should be ${LDFLAGS:-} for > consistency with the others, but what I wrote is functionally correct: > > ${LDFLAGS-FOO} means "If LDFLAGS is set at all (even to an empty > value), substitute $LDFLAGS; otherwise, substitute FOO". Interesting! Ok, I stand corrected. I was looking through the bash man page to refresh my memory, and I didn't see that option. Good thing I didn't put any money on it! jamie.