From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E404431FBD for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:34:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.401 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ajRfi1lj5Ep for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE76C431FB6 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V11GO-0006lv-Du; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:33:56 +0100 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V11GO-000422-2E; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:33:56 +0100 From: Mark Walters To: Tomi Ollila , David Bremner , notmuch mailing list Subject: Re: second freeze for 0.16, now with more freezieness In-Reply-To: References: <87ip0rj7vn.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ip05e73v.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+192~g8222af3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:33:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87txjnegxr.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: ba8aead382c92e69a2a31c00d903f384 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.6 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: / X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored 0.6 points. Summary of the scoring: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails * -0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 21:34:11 -0000 On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20 2013, David Bremner wrote: > >> David Bremner writes: >> >>> Hi Gang; >>> >>> I'll be off the grid for about 12 days, starting on Friday. I thought >>> that made pretty good sense as a freeze time. On the other hand, I >>> realize people may have a few last minute items (hopefully small) for >>> 0.16, so I will consider such suggestions when I get back. >>> >> >> I have added 5 more patches to the release (and master) branch, including >> jrollins' crypto bugfix. Hopefully this is very close to release, please >> test. > > I'd say 1fd1e57 (with some NEWS) is good for release. I've been running > 3484372 w/ id:1374163617-23740-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi > > Since 3484372 was pushed and this has been working fine (i.e. the same > from testing perspective). What about adding id:1372976299-30389-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com to the release branch (but not trunk). Then whatever correct fix we decide on can go in later and we avoid a potential string of bug reports from 0.16? Best wishes Mark