From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5146DE13AB for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:26:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.112 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cj5mR0bol3yv for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7F446DE0B7C for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfS4Z-0004ur-HH; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:25:55 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 19292 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:25:36 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test suite: don't consider skipped individual tests as failing In-Reply-To: References: <1443093210-6511-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+73~gd432116 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:25:36 -0300 Message-ID: <87twqi1y9r.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:26:57 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > > Looks OK, but I think there should be (some good) comment here informing > any potential viewer that we're not checking $skipped... > I put some vaguely threatening comment in test/README, and a brief comment in the file. I've merged the commit, but feel free to send suggestions / patches for further doc changes. I more or less made up a hypothetical future policy on the spot... d