From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F5B6DE0C66 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 04:45:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jv-OmIQue9vN for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 04:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8EF6DE0C64 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 04:45:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dopl0-0005TC-5e; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 07:41:34 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 11661 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:45:11 -0000 From: David Bremner To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Improved citation washing. In-Reply-To: <20170827134623.20041-1-dme@dme.org> References: <20170827134623.20041-1-dme@dme.org> Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:45:11 -0300 Message-ID: <87tw0iwuuw.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:45:18 -0000 David Edmondson writes: > Improved citation washing. > > - More aggressive citation washing. > - Allow washing during text/plain reply generation. > > -- > > I acknowledge that some of the citation washing can seem aggressive at > times, but it does make my life more pleasant (no more shouting at the > screen "what was he thinking!" when someone uses a weird quoting > style). Aside from the whining about the tests, I have a hard time reviewing these changes. I tried several messages and nothing exploded, but I didn't have much of a sense of "yeah, this makes things better", or "ugh, this is too aggressive". Do you any suggested messages to look at (maybe from the list?). Cheers, and thanks working on the emacs UI. d