From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: "Floris Bruynooghe" <flub@devork.be>,
"Brian May" <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz>,
"David Čepelík" <d@dcepelik.cz>,
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: segfault using python bindings
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 20:15:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tvkgtv8a.fsf@tethera.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pnv4bt2t.fsf@powell.devork.be>
Floris Bruynooghe <flub@devork.be> writes:
>> As I mentioned last time this was discussed, the python bindings are
>> currently more or less a core part of notmuch as both the test
>> suite and developement need them.
>
> Sure, I think pypi publishing is orthogonal to this however. Either or
> both versions of the bindings could be published on pypi in addition to
> being in the main repo. As Brian mentions it would improve
> discoverability and improves integration on the python side. There's
> even tooling to bundle the library these days with the manylinux1
> wheels. So there's no need to stop anyone who'd like to do this.
Well, I agree with all that (and did in the previous thread too). But
the context was Florian's idea of publishing on pypi instead of/before
integrating with notmuch. That's of course his right to do, but my main
(selfish) interest is in having python bindings shipping with notmuch
that work properly with recent python3. I guess even having a separate
set of incompatible python3 only bindings would be better than the
current situation. We could just ship the two bindings in parallel,
deprecate the python2 bindings, and give people a year or so to
transition.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-17 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-09 14:49 segfault using python bindings David Čepelík
2018-11-11 20:16 ` David Bremner
2018-11-11 20:21 ` Gaute Hope
2018-11-15 21:13 ` Floris Bruynooghe
2018-11-16 4:44 ` Brian May
2018-11-16 10:29 ` David Bremner
2018-11-16 21:39 ` Floris Bruynooghe
2018-11-17 0:15 ` David Bremner [this message]
2018-11-16 10:27 ` David Bremner
2018-11-16 12:15 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2018-11-16 22:07 ` Floris Bruynooghe
2019-08-14 19:20 ` David Bremner
2019-08-15 9:53 ` Floris Bruynooghe
2019-08-15 12:28 ` David Bremner
2019-08-20 17:20 ` Floris Bruynooghe
2019-08-21 16:02 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2019-08-22 19:24 ` David Bremner
2019-08-22 19:37 ` Rollins, Jameson
2019-08-23 0:09 ` David Bremner
2019-08-23 1:59 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2019-08-23 12:07 ` David Bremner
2019-08-23 20:43 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2019-08-23 22:58 ` Rollins, Jameson
2019-08-26 17:09 ` Floris Bruynooghe
2019-08-26 17:28 ` David Bremner
2018-11-18 20:22 ` Dirk Van Haerenborgh
2018-11-18 23:34 ` David Bremner
2018-11-19 9:09 ` Dirk Van Haerenborgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tvkgtv8a.fsf@tethera.net \
--to=david@tethera.net \
--cc=brian@linuxpenguins.xyz \
--cc=d@dcepelik.cz \
--cc=flub@devork.be \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).