From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CF9431FBC for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:21:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.719 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.280, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l94fxbB55i9P for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65516431FAE for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com [72.227.128.66]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1ICKkta018893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:20:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni5N8-0005jm-1J; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:20:46 -0500 From: Jameson Rollins To: racin@free.fr, martin f krafft In-Reply-To: <899270357.3379251266482068203.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net> References: <899270357.3379251266482068203.JavaMail.root@zimbra1-e1.priv.proxad.net> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:20:38 -0500 Message-ID: <87sk8yka5l.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8 Cc: Ben Gamari , notmuch Subject: Re: Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:21:02 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:34:28 +0100 (CET), racin@free.fr wrote: > I don't understand the problem. Why not just letting all "inbox" mails in= a regular Maildir,=20 > and use git only when they have been explicit archived? This way, mails a= re added to git only if we want > to save them, and we rarely (never?) need to remove mail from the git sto= re. Deleting mail > is also much easier to do from the maildir. This mail flow would make muc= h more sense to me. I agree that this sounds much simpler and far easier to implement. Once you're passed any deletion phase, using git sounds much more sensible. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLfTCXAAoJEO00zqvie6q8tN0P/2ES6Kdk9/FkfMNltE80rDAS YlLHWN1C6ByM3NNqr0i5CSdaBxzdLOuOVOfMHhWRJYpGNe1sQ/ChqE1yOZckvtim r9bNN4AUF/FN2K5VsPqa3l6EdRdnM9BXFphbr2tKJCyU6AuUV/gGO0WhcHnyd/Ky w6vzj4n+N1vohFcBy2vKS6Dq10niVGwujjbHvFZ3XoXl07bH+YRfMIS4nQS66xiT XIsQIdmFka2UxJQeTFU4p3mfKxZbDJLPGFY97k3RlCDVGpJijXNMEANBzQ95QbN5 hhIPB94GCuwXHEd00toUAYDzPvPMCL2ugRPzJ7p1S81iJCZHrq3zZ2spuHL+Nljh P98UiATawcKPYLRCtjVbJs5btd1PWgKX2KJRibmiSTBwGvv2rJgM4bfhrXRcEit1 yzDaALFbxBxXHB4lxgNqjsStYU5xWDz2V4lrdDZtVxfe9ViV72yWbvQkEfbOP/A7 IS42+2lv5nS21WTgUZgplR3ON4tEvnUlwrE2IoQMQSKWzFeVhboIL6iQjSu97tm/ lKOw9y5uYbdu2pg7KHN8+cFxp9k96rcFDPGce/H+GUfTuMqDGrGHQ9uTVBf0GfuK wgCOVU5Y16m1jp+8Sr433F5HpLyDxPhwfmae6xYNijqDGaYICeYHTxiMlCpZVfP/ chHkuSCq9kZAve2vUA2m =BtsF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--