From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96938431FBC for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.248 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=1.151, BAYES_00=-2.599] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8fbII85Fhgot; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E538431FAE; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4B8425427B; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:46 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vljekipnd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <87ljf8pvxx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87hbpwpoko.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <5641883d1002060727ia4e6c16lf800a92fc8735430@mail.gmail.com> <201002081614.24284.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <871vgr78lr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87iqa2y0gz.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> <87r5oqe7mi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <871vgmki4f.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> <7vaav8hpfo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <87tytdiqob.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> <873a0xhwxs.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87eikfhec1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <7vaav3bnr5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <87y6ilf4w7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <7vljekipnd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:46 -0800 Message-ID: <87sk8rvmj1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Johannes Sixt , Johannes Schindelin , Pierre Habouzit , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Sverre Rabbelier Subject: Re: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+. X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:23:49 -0000 --=-=-= On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:42:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Please drop the above the next time. Oops. Yes, I missed that. > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not > meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you more. Fair enough. > You are the party that wants this relicensing, not me. Please do not > burden me with excessive legwork for you, but help me a bit more > proactively to make this happen. I hope you see I haven't asked you to do any additional legwork. A suggestion was made to construct a patch, which I did. You always have the option of accepting or rejecting the patch as you see fit. > Oh, I never said "do not use message ID". I said "message ID alone is not > good enough for most people". Users of gmane and notmuch who know the > tool they use would benefit from having message ID, _too_, but even if you > were a user of notmuch, unless you have subscribed to the list and have > your own archive, you wouldn't be able to say "show id:frotz". Certainly. My assumption was that in a commit message for git, readers would naturally assume that a message ID with no additional specification could be found in the archives of the standard git mailing list, (which is the case here). Otherwise, I would have qualified the message ID more specifically. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLhB0y6JDdNq8qSWgRAiwEAKCki1ecxM9ER1gc2oYhYj527s7LTQCfbUhW KmeGdMU+jf/znCoVZpcQhik= =+/rP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--