From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE01429E25 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:28:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6utqFx5h-Od for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB18C431FB6 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5072266E0158; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:28:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (DHCP-123-180.caltech.edu [131.215.123.180]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094C666E0299; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B8F256C; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:55:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: David Bremner , Daniel Schoepe , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Patch review/application process In-Reply-To: <87hb2n7w82.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid> <87hb2n7w82.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+39~g74c9dba (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:55:09 -0700 Message-ID: <87sjm74z36.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:28:48 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:28:45 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Maybe you can tag those patches as "notmuch::reviewed" using nmbug? [1] > My idea is that=20 >=20 > notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and tag:notmuch::reviewed >=20 > should give a kind of consensus set of "ready to go" patch sets. Don't forget notmuch::applied, which I think is actually one of the most important. Review is easy to see by looking at the patch thread. Being able to easily find which patches have not yet been applied to master is what I'm most looking forward to. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOsBZdAAoJEO00zqvie6q8obYP/j3RvSBIXv+sVZSVrLRxAtjJ tLgez6Fad5/m5wY5Oux8XLKUGpPFh5M5rjuF7isVx1fr5WQJH48HwJ5u3v6R5ZOg yKMmsBLJ+9n+4eg2kRwi8bSbF03q60OMZqTzVFI22O/inZMDuSOpivZC4juk9gCm HhR/CkMrG79l8c6Kr5SfJJSl2oXX9sN+3JU+4CxoQ7viqy03GyiDBYwGrPVrvkJC 7DhZe6/PoPvzRQCHUJun04IX5teG8p4H/yzn/ZEDeexGoX1g9cn6CiZXDsFaGqQ5 GbGH8w0oklRNC0bY2eWiKeOdqV69P7XkisyJdPMKWaX7Jz3SIKYU8pj3RDzuSQT+ DcluBrHL3aFr334IIzBvyrodSMiTOWrCW5blWDxwyFtin9/OdWA1VbxLZohlG84z 3Glldc4ghQm3y8zxw24JP3054W+4twxvEma/NJdLFMnjFXbxi2kosuy9SmjWn+hz RSVpeKY0iSS+3Ic9v9SSkq2bsYL2QNxYeOFgKgRmDGZAMeJmbZcidoN4HqP/ziTr EKieB9d3rKRAvRb5n6eWJlZQ6K2kbjTxQaxeBBnlGpEvYDoUfkAWN0qGgHKwwnZw NmzrtCfKNGJnXA6SuJxEtUYs2GS1RqVZRIWa5wDEW3hq1hCm+8uZVDryzh6N5//J sXPi2076alNHmcgIZVCt =+fOq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--