From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1429431FC4 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cYzD-sdb4XFd for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC46431FAF for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SaWsK-0006g8-KE; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:47:04 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SaWsF-0003ea-9d; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:46:59 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Felipe Contreras , "Justus Winter" <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> Subject: Re: Can't compile notmuch-delivery In-Reply-To: <87mx4mvqch.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <20120531214259.GA18272@desktop> <87lik7171d.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87sjefufub.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <874nqu28y1.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87mx4mvqch.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:46:59 -0300 Message-ID: <87sjeezx7g.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam_bar: - Cc: Ali Polatel , notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:47:13 -0000 Jameson Graef Rollins writes: > I think the zeroth-order thing we have to do then is to have the build > include the bindings as well. Then everyone will be able to see > immediately if the bindings are broken. I wouldn't even make it an > option, or make it an option to exclude building the bindings rather > than to include. OK, I can agree with this. Can we get some help from the bindings maintainers (or other interested people) in getting this working? Probably configure should detect/decide what bindings to build. d