From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841D86DE1769 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.321 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pZBnnbsI-gjt for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:14:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1B36DE1704 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:14:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a4twC-0002H8-9G; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:14:28 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 1396 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:14:26 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Damien Cassou , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To In-Reply-To: <87fuzi9ng5.fsf@cassou.me> References: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me> <8737vi8l7j.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87fuzi9ng5.fsf@cassou.me> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+5~gca076ce (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 13:14:26 -0400 Message-ID: <87si3ijfv1.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:14:35 -0000 Damien Cassou writes: > > The last sentence seems to contradict my example: > > Note that the address in the Reply-To header will always appear in > the reply. > The feature, and the comment, predate the "--reply-to=sender" option so maybe something needs to be updated. d