From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6317A6DE12E8 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:31:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.82 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QB7NPVQqMTeZ for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:31:07 -0800 (PST) X-Greylist: delayed 535 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:31:07 PST Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C136DE12E4 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:31:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3F4204D2 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:22:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:22:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=qHm zsLCi1Z3iC7UzB2XTO09NC/Y=; b=oqM+W0wDw07OC6z/fBanhIacl8kUfmXLLkV xL1Eg2YHNEYsiyd1Es35glCOdXB+G4QfzQtohlepEAn/bzDgvG1LgWFrgZFf4vSO EtViIsU0BkwlmnVXRBYexbOaKFVH+yfV3Eua+1Pehj1NaeEc/AChHZx8uTIFA7KA YFf9BZ/E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=qHmzsLCi1Z3iC7UzB2XTO09NC/Y=; b=VU2Kh yxMf+2+ey8mIv0AOejoNPh4ifTVEzpDlzFw78FSWze7zkW5/rGF/oi6PycxsiuwD 1moLJeIUYoqDpAl3c6U8ZNX0o/1D0xAYj8KcKpazWzgqu82jeX9iq4NoOl/e0HO3 KF/M/esfatpqd/cMDxdBcI/RVT+ScKcI5DJ0IY= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 9toAw/8Fq0G16h8WKZbz6GsIG4IQosj7mULnQBP9v9EF 1479842531 Received: from localhost (128.92-221-147.customer.lyse.net [92.221.147.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0E9297E430 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:22:10 -0500 (EST) From: Marius Bakke To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: T350 test failures with gnupg-2.1.16 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.23.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:22:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87shqj5nha.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:39:49 -0800 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:31:09 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello! After updating to gnupg 2.1.16, T350-crypto.sh fails in some of the signature verification steps with wrong content-length: T350-crypto: Testing PGP/MIME signature verification and decryption PASS emacs delivery of signed message FAIL signature verification --- T350-crypto.2.expected 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000 +++ T350-crypto.2.output 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "id": 2 }, { - "content-length": 280, + "content-length": 312, "content-type": "application/pgp-signature", "id": 3 } FAIL signature verification with full owner trust --- T350-crypto.3.expected 2016-11-22 18:59:48.393853469 +0000 +++ T350-crypto.3.output 2016-11-22 18:59:48.393853469 +0000 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "id": 2 }, { - "content-length": 280, + "content-length": 312, "content-type": "application/pgp-signature", "id": 3 } FAIL signature verification with signer key unavailable --- T350-crypto.4.expected 2016-11-22 18:59:48.445855285 +0000 +++ T350-crypto.4.output 2016-11-22 18:59:48.445855285 +0000 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "id": 2 }, { - "content-length": 280, + "content-length": 312, "content-type": "application/pgp-signature", "id": 3 } PASS emacs delivery of encrypted message with attachment PASS decryption, --format=text PASS decryption, --format=json PASS decryption, --format=json, --part=4 PASS decrypt attachment (--part=5 --format=raw) PASS decryption failure with missing key PASS emacs delivery of encrypted + signed message PASS decryption + signature verification PASS reply to encrypted message PASS Reply within emacs to an encrypted message FAIL signature verification with revoked key --- T350-crypto.15.expected 2016-11-22 18:59:49.505892318 +0000 +++ T350-crypto.15.output 2016-11-22 18:59:49.505892318 +0000 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "id": 2 }, { - "content-length": 280, + "content-length": 312, "content-type": "application/pgp-signature", "id": 3 } Downgrading gpg to 2.1.15 makes the tests pass as expected. Here is the NEWS for 2.1.16: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2016-11/msg00006.html Let me know if I can provide any further information. Please CC me in replies as I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJYNJrhAAoJEKKgbfKjOlT63kAIAJ1Roy+vcCVCaho4qnOYlDsL 5NbHTuJTD7c8l3UCRM3Kb1jJjRrwPB4iYTh+XVL5BB70BHNxr02FDsr7TH5oo/Rz p0+6St7DLDu93crAhYDmKt6PWWbPCgdLUtwR9znaYySuZaEuITQKVTzjf0kiBG/q RfkJ4epj+cUthBpR0TkVHQoAglyg15Qz0Osh6UZ5Le/kB/2Emgm6/P2YyiT4jOdk hKcHlZ7AmQCWKJj0bktjWxtjiqRYy8ki1JHjeGGvU7DD/TrPjMj2YTOxsRR+N64f sEa/mXBK/aD7fB7dDNx+if70phQ/ssuZt9z3clzXXGjrSUFAH08v82/6VxbzjsE= =yXIK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--