From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8FC6DE208C
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:05:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.005
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, 
 SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id T9b41Wynk1_9 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3E086DE2083
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
 id 1cgLMi-00024c-CU; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:05:08 -0500
Received: (nullmailer pid 27090 invoked by uid 1000);
 Wed, 22 Feb 2017 01:05:44 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: read after free in notmuch new
In-Reply-To: <m2tw7ne1fv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
References: <87efyu6zdg.fsf@tethera.net> <87bmty6vwu.fsf@tethera.net>
 <87d1ec5ki4.fsf@tethera.net> <m2tw7ne1fv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:05:44 -0400
Message-ID: <87shn73uhj.fsf@tethera.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 01:05:50 -0000

Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:

> To me it looks like replacing g_hash_table_insert() with 
> g_hash_table_replace() would do the trick.
>
> (or even g_hash_table_add()!)
>
> One has to read the documentation a bit (and compare the docstrings of
> these 2 functions to guess the missing pieces) to get some understanding to
> this...
>

Hi Tomi;

Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately in my experiments it just
shifts the invalid memory access to a different piece of memory. I think
the problem is that a pointer to the previous copy of that key also
leaked a reference via last_ref, so when we kill that via
g_hash_table_replace it causes the same problem.

d