From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACC26DE0EC5 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 04:43:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.043 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id akIk5_Hv2bnQ for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 04:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870386DE0F17 for ; Wed, 29 May 2019 04:43:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hVwzl-0000xW-9k; Wed, 29 May 2019 07:43:49 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 18175 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 29 May 2019 11:44:00 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Protected Headers (2nd major revision, more testing!) In-Reply-To: <20190526221610.2833-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> References: <20190526221610.2833-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 08:44:00 -0300 Message-ID: <87sgsxtri7.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 11:43:53 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > Hi all-- > > Way back in id:20180511055544.13676-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net, i > proposed support for protected headers (in particular, for being able > to read and search for subject lines of encrypted messages which > protect the Subject). Although that series was reviewed by Bremner, i > never managed to get it in shape for merging. > > This is a revision of that series, applied against the current master, > having taken into account those reviews and the current state of the > notmuch codebase. I'm hoping that we can get it into 0.29 before the > feature freeze. It's in. I did bodge things up slightly due to the threading of patch 14, but I added the trivial patch with the one line change I missed. d