From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ekeberg@kth.se>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64FA6DE12DD
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  3 Jun 2019 02:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.696
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[AWL=-0.194, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id EGn2VecDrsFE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Mon,  3 Jun 2019 02:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [130.237.48.193])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A706DE12D6
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  3 Jun 2019 02:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9670A2855;
 Mon,  3 Jun 2019 11:18:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se
Received: from smtp-4.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1])
 by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (smtp-4.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 2JVFqpy2pen5; Mon,  3 Jun 2019 11:18:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-KTH-Auth: ekeberg [85.229.204.229]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kth.se; s=default;
 t=1559553531; bh=I1/ed4RUyRvlhzJl6LbbGsrAvD76FfXdm/hJ7VVdRek=;
 h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
 b=KMM7WkrYLGVDhkwbuT6yXWLvI8NkqixCjr//wgfuQRvY2K/DHQVdbh8z3K4oPlequ
 xIsAmohORhuVP2lmSgLsNy1qS0ta01QWUDmV0kZd62iTA2ZApuzwIjsy9ehos2v5eb
 o4SobvGgegzQsr+yc2GfqoMMy6i8ux32TyTjRb+c=
X-KTH-mail-from: ekeberg@kth.se
Received: from swing (c-e5cce555.09-723-73746f39.bbcust.telenor.se
 [85.229.204.229])
 by smtp-4.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A13D48B;
 Mon,  3 Jun 2019 11:18:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=96rjan?= Ekeberg <ekeberg@kth.se>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: notmuch-message-mark-replied
In-Reply-To: <87r28e40m6.fsf@tethera.net>
References: <87r28e40m6.fsf@tethera.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:18:50 +0200
Message-ID: <87sgsrt4at.fsf@swing.csc.kth.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:18:56 -0000

David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
> In  d9800c8 we deleted the function notmuch-message-mark-replied.
>
> Should we make a deprecated-alias for
> notmuch-message-apply-queued-tag-changes?

The two functions are not interchangeable, so it may not be appropriate
to mark it as an alias.

notmuch-message-mark-replied looked for a In-Reply-To: header while
notmuch-message-apply-queued-tag-changes checks if the message has
notmuch-message-queued-tag-changes set (it is set when composing a reply).

On the other hand; if a user has code which explicitly sets the
message-send-hook, the new function will serve as the natural
replacement for the deleted one.

/=C3=96rjan