From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C636DE0C32 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:18:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.395 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.194, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3RxUMHFhjy7b for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com (mail-wm1-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08A686DE0924 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id k1so8735013wmi.1 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:18:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=cTBf/qc5c0dAQpOKscw2klkz1QCLvTfaWDGixPQmbY8=; b=eQNt7jPYYwqUqk+a+fwafB4ajfGnuxQnRsr8WgejehvFCgXSZ4Wq1xQsARiEIcax0K e3BAnjrlc+/Ln9dK3mJD1kvDRfAXgsYfYOYxlIENXdznbUhUpnhoJeto5W1TvZIW8pne 7ksRc3cPAbBkzXYEBWwveTzG2b5IiouyiRZt68qxpWlrmAPltqJMIxm7Z6EyfzWCUVVH WdkPO81IED/B3po1+9Mbf185UF5xoHZjAKU7cZBUudAQBYoQsAa+Rw164mYnf/QyeY/K Jjl/FMgX5tIEmw9XKtl6LUL72PLn2duznW+6ZMe+LS76F1r5mzPgtbGvNsZPsTWFISU0 L2Mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=cTBf/qc5c0dAQpOKscw2klkz1QCLvTfaWDGixPQmbY8=; b=dzN68MYjNurHEOOlqCmm399+hbb7dYsughIeHo5YirGhxs8UHCHePjF3+kCergn1S6 c3ihHDwbXB/mh9RBGfw6nyPOnfWj/yPV3rVpqp+/dE8zXXA0QjGTJx+PsEMAdwFSepYU M+ubH+G8eoE735qno3Po2XIWrIcfOnEJ7ti6uBEeUt9lKkf2B5lsYP6y7s0lgXyMwj3K onuwPiu7qb2Zuzc8d4Ekj9qS0XGF/4JlrTHoXgBL1OgOIoc/D+CuQpAmVEnGRKAYFNW3 +R4ALKMASHCPLtkV1Fk//nu3+GOVHuLkOnQwugyxr69H03FlyWVnu5V9veCPOetWraJt KcVg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW+ecqrLWsgMmzux8A0NwSPDNkK8qrWiQ6C7IsXm4q39Kn2Vqh9 ktXHcgmFuDMd+Sv/wp6G3WY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzjTSKj7WN8ylnkeW82olCnpzwGZ/LlACbTyu1hvdAYCeWf2i/spkJcOlAI1+fI0FCEnRiNWQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:80d0:: with SMTP id b199mr4847206wmd.31.1566562698098; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([77.238.202.32]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p19sm3370220wmg.31.2019.08.23.05.18.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:18:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Sanel Zukan To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Threaded view would do annoying scroll In-Reply-To: <87wof5gizy.fsf@tethera.net> References: <87imqq7v0v.fsf@example.com> <87wof5gizy.fsf@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.28.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:18:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgpsvzw8.fsf@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 07:02:14 -0700 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:18:22 -0000 Hi David, Actually, I've had Emacs session running for a couple of weeks where I've been also hacking some elisp code - I guess I've changed something and forgot about that. Your comment prompted me to try obvious approach - to dissect my init.el file and, at the end, simple Emacs restart solved the problem. Thanks and apologies for the noise. Best regards, Sanel David Bremner writes: > Sanel Zukan writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm using Emacs 26.2 and Notmuch 0.28.2 and I noticed that after >> updating Emacs to 26.2, notmuch would start doing annoying (auto)scroll >> inside thraded view opened message, probably trying to center the >> message. The search is done calling `notmuch-search`. >> >> Anyone got similar behavior or knows how to mitigate it? Notmuch would >> work fine in Emacs 24.3.1. >> > > I haven't noticed anything like this in emacs 26.1. Can you give us a > recipe to reproduce the problem, e.g. with a thread from the notmuch > mailing list? > > d