From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0FB6DE0ECC for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:20:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.057 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.057 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.056, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vdl7xVUO8aEq for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098296DE0232 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHtAG-00052t-ET; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:20:48 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 6217 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:20:46 -0000 From: David Bremner To: meOme , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch show get newest message first In-Reply-To: <1570526920923-0.post@n3.nabble.com> References: <1570526920923-0.post@n3.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 14:20:46 -0300 Message-ID: <87sgo3nogh.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 17:20:54 -0000 meOme writes: > Hi! > Is it possible to get the newest message first in a result of notmuch show? > The result always shows a reply to a message after the message. But as the > reply is newer than the original message the sorting within the replies is > oldest first. It would be great to have "newest-first". > Is that possible? > Thanks a lot for not much. > If you refer notmuch-show mode in the emacs interface, the order is defined by a topological sort of the tree of replies. It's currently not possible to reverse it; I guess it's possible in principle, but notice the last displayed message is not neccesarily the last bye date.