From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2OioItwgyF6uKgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:58:36 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EAaKHtwgyF4MOAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:58:36 +0000 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED118940039 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 18:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426316DE0ECC; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Km6NRHgMvakN; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F7A6DE0EE3; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889366DE0EE3 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0EJbVvCmHvoN for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21206DE0ECC for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id g14so4964096wme.1 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=I3mqnQmLVzNuyl/PHzM9fcNJt/nXMLyiGijyZRBspQ0=; b=BUilwsIrKCIQ3OyxE+z/fYzPSkZytJe/TVmnDastY6o0dTUVhGlhfdjrGfooRReC/c 2pOJfdqEQLwNpOgKb+ODf8tVAhnOE65Kyf8zznfKAI3bF7kGhgDaJ5GlqIES1TeSRcsH NVQP6K3ehI+KlvUqwFurgZdn/WGj4rFmmT6mwjBJh1aMQEYE9NPIUseFxPgk+oMZIhrM LsE0EQvuxWvF3ChehypOfEWySWFtZPwL0NynmqNVGrHKuSE7FubO80G22wkmjq6Qz7sQ PjIYxF2/WK3+lYjlQwiWtLl6zNqLw9I27JCXokNi0cAkcPQs6GgqJYu67CL+pwubG7PX wzBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=I3mqnQmLVzNuyl/PHzM9fcNJt/nXMLyiGijyZRBspQ0=; b=tFLdj/rsB+VR/Ki1ctLlivrFNN7SGE8jQkTUqWb4tiHjxG6UQzTBSsZpX1Okvee3tw IEmtBSblogFwnxUJpvAf3Nvv3OwP4+SUpnhiRdlU/ok7/l8ZZrvNhJKtnhbD/KTCjCZd VussGjnZlqkTbBcEZ931iEWJeVOq2a1qm3oqtiIvMvAVA35qV8s2csAGNo+5HIhtSZE/ XEkFqvcdlEHEy5HTr+R6WI944KqJ3/b3RQwE3Byv7KZFRsi1oCpD9Y3oJMeevGes8PUX Koa4ZmaGG/0iaUC/39rrD2TcSl43lxtK4teLqkXAZwJTsC8Mqy9ZSrKWpJ5tgKc05ffg Zc2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kYXdr5q3NKLkOjtegjHiOMrHZi3HXqAohC9rE4PGYrNa9rOD9 bLS4po8BzVxSXXgjMZtrLBA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyumteVln9Vab4A/UE8gkXJDseEyH7NgHiIh1o8jRhzoi93QLNkDpjrOPcqx42dNsDOdtVG2Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2e46:: with SMTP id u67mr13922802wmu.156.1590173900835; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (5751dfa2.skybroadband.com. [87.81.223.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s8sm9812525wrt.69.2020.05.22.11.58.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Walters To: Radu Butoi , Daniel Kahn Gillmor , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: split-window-sensibly in tree mode with open message In-Reply-To: References: <87367tj6jl.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:58:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgfrbxv8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org Sender: "notmuch" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=BUilwsIr; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 50.126.95.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: wKg/yZR+NQFv Hi > For some historical context, split-window-sensibly was introduced in 2009 [1] and the (split-window-vertically (/ (window-height) 4)) code in 2012 [2]. The two functions seem pretty interchangeable. As far as I can see the split-window-sensibly version splits the window into two equal parts, whereas the split-window-vertically version (deliberately) makes the message pane bigger than the thread pane. I definitely prefer the current version (unsurprising as I chose the split back in 2012), but others may disagree. Best wishes Mark