Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy?

[Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1811 bytes --]

Xiyue Deng <manphiz@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Sean,
>
> Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes:
>
>> Hello Xiyue,
>>
>> On Mon 02 Dec 2024 at 01:28pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
>>
>>> I have made a MR[1] including a few quick fixes for the RC bugs, in hope
>>> that they are acceptable for another NMU to unblock this package and its
>>> dependencies.  PTAL.  Thanks!
>>>
>>> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pgpy/-/merge_requests/2
>>
>> Thank you very much for taking a look at this one.
>>
>> I'm a bit queasy about just disabling the failing tests.  Do we have
>> reason to believe that pgpy is not actually broken with Python 3.13?
>> In other words, what makes you think that it's just the tests that are
>> broken, not the program?
>>
>
> I don't have an answer yet.  I have tested 0.6.0-1.3 in a bookworm
> sbuild chroot which has Python 3.11 and the tests passed.  The build log
> in Bug#1086378 shows it was using Python 3.12, so I would assume
> something changed in Python 3.12 was the cause.  I would do some further
> checks to be sure.  Though I do hope people familiar with the matters
> can beat me to it.
>

Looks like this has nothing to do with Python version but gpgme: I have
tested with a snapshot of gpgme1.0 version 1.18.0-6+b1 and everything
works; upgrading to version 1.23.2-5 and the tests start to show the
same errors.  I have been trying to see what has changed from gpgme side
but so far nothing conclusive yet.

On the other hand, python-pgpy may be working fine as all failures in
the tests are caused by using the gpgme python binding, which somehow
doesn't like the PGP signed message generated by python-pgpy anymore.

>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- 
>> Sean Whitton
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Xiyue Deng

-- 
Regards,
Xiyue Deng

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 857 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]