From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2BF431FBD
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 8YQ-ie0cH-06 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f220.google.com (mail-ew0-f220.google.com
	[209.85.219.220])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22652431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so989234ewy.0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.15.14 with SMTP id i14mr1135090eba.83.1265875236841;
	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aw.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com
	[83.217.165.81])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm4742195eyg.20.2010.02.11.00.00.35
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by aw.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 12BA53A03F; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:00:17 +0000 (GMT)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <877hqk4xr7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <87vde4derz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<877hqk4xr7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:00:16 +0000
Message-ID: <87r5os5hin.fsf@aw.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: emacs: On getting support for inline images
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:00:41 -0000

> PS. I know that attaching the output of "git format-patch" to a message
> like this isn't the "git way". (That is, you won't get the right result
> by simply piping this message to "git am".) But I really wish it
> were. It seems I often write code in response to an email message and I
> often want to reply to that *message* and incidentally provide a
> patch. The git way, with the commit message in the subject and the first
> part of the body seems backwards to me, (as far as the conversation is
> concerned).

How about attaching a message/rfc822 part which contains the patch?