* RFC: User-Agent header @ 2010-04-08 8:26 Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-08 15:12 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-11 22:12 ` Sebastian Spaeth 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-08 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Notmuch list notmuch is (mostly) not responsible for sending email. However, people using the emacs frontend use notmuch to create the reply. Am I the only one who is sometimes curious as to what mail agents others use? Would it be useful to insert a header to notmuch reply analog to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) We could reuse the same version string that we use for the release (or the git string that was used to build notmuch). I can use this to create nice stats :). No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not. Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-08 8:26 RFC: User-Agent header Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-08 15:12 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-10 2:55 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-10 14:02 ` Xavier Maillard 2010-04-11 22:12 ` Sebastian Spaeth 1 sibling, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Dirk Hohndel @ 2010-04-08 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > notmuch is (mostly) not responsible for sending email. However, people > using the emacs frontend use notmuch to create the reply. > > Am I the only one who is sometimes curious as to what mail agents others > use? Would it be useful to insert a header to notmuch reply analog to: > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) > > We could reuse the same version string that we use for the release (or > the git string that was used to build notmuch). I can use this to create > nice stats :). > > No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not. I think it's a very good idea. But it should be something that includes the other components of how you send email... Like User-Aget: Emacs 23 Message-mode / notmuch-0.1.1 /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-08 15:12 ` Dirk Hohndel @ 2010-04-10 2:55 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-10 4:43 ` Dirk Hohndel ` (2 more replies) 2010-04-10 14:02 ` Xavier Maillard 1 sibling, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Carl Worth @ 2010-04-10 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dirk Hohndel, Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1260 bytes --] On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not. Yes. A fine idea. > I think it's a very good idea. But it should be something that includes > the other components of how you send email... > > Like > > User-Aget: Emacs 23 Message-mode / notmuch-0.1.1 A quick grep through some of my recent mails does show precedent for this kind of thing: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) Unsurprisingly, these suer-agent strings can become arbitrarily unwieldy: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 Or extremely simple: User-Agent: Sup/0.11 I don't see the advantage of duplicating the name and version in the parenthesized comment, but here's an idea that looks useful: User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) So I propose something like: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) If anybody wants to start assembling a patch to generate that, that would be great. -Carl [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-10 2:55 ` Carl Worth @ 2010-04-10 4:43 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-10 13:16 ` Jameson Rollins 2010-04-10 14:00 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Dirk Hohndel @ 2010-04-10 4:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carl Worth, Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote: > So I propose something like: > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) +1 /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-10 2:55 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-10 4:43 ` Dirk Hohndel @ 2010-04-10 13:16 ` Jameson Rollins 2010-04-10 14:00 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Jameson Rollins @ 2010-04-10 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carl Worth, Dirk Hohndel, Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 552 bytes --] On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:55:17 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote: > So I propose something like: > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) The problem I see is that if we go with this proposal, our mail will have inconsistent User-Agent: header, depending on if the message was new or if it's a reply. Maybe that's not too big of an issue, though, since the in the reply case notmuch is generating some of the headers, whereas they're all generated by emacs in the new message case. jamie. [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-10 2:55 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-10 4:43 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-10 13:16 ` Jameson Rollins @ 2010-04-10 14:00 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-10 14:45 ` Dirk Hohndel 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-10 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carl Worth, Dirk Hohndel, Notmuch list On 2010-04-10, Carl Worth wrote: > So I propose something like: > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) That looks good to me. So I assume the correct strategy here would be to: 1) have notmuch reply insert a header: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) 2) have notmuch-reply.el (or whatever) add a setup mail hook that searches for an existing User-Agent header and appends " Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux)" One issue is again, such a hook would be message mode specific, so gnus users might not appreciate that. Also when composing a message via c-x m this would not work. So perhaps an all lisp solution? Again, can we hijack message mode to add our own promotion header? Or has the time come for a notmuch-message-mode that somehow inherits from message mode? bremner said something about dynamic bindings that would allow that. Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-10 14:00 ` Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-10 14:45 ` Dirk Hohndel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Dirk Hohndel @ 2010-04-10 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Spaeth, Carl Worth, Notmuch list On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:00:49 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > On 2010-04-10, Carl Worth wrote: > > So I propose something like: > > > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (gnu/linux) > > That looks good to me. So I assume the correct strategy here would be > to: > > 1) have notmuch reply insert a header: > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) > > 2) have notmuch-reply.el (or whatever) add a setup mail hook that > searches for an existing User-Agent header and appends " Emacs/23.1.1 > (gnu/linux)" > > One issue is again, such a hook would be message mode > specific, so gnus users might not appreciate that. Also when composing a > message via c-x m this would not work. So perhaps an all lisp solution? > Again, can we hijack message mode to add our own promotion header? > Or has the time come for a notmuch-message-mode that somehow inherits > from message mode? bremner said something about dynamic bindings that > would allow that. I really think we need to investigate having a notmuch-message-mode as there are now a number of reasons to be able to customize things when the user is running notmuch. BTW: I don't think these are "promotion headers" - I relatively frequently want to check which email client someone else is using when I'm trying to figure out why things go wrong (incorrect mail headers, mangled spacing (in patches, for example), incorrect HTML messages, etc) /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-08 15:12 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-10 2:55 ` Carl Worth @ 2010-04-10 14:02 ` Xavier Maillard 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Xavier Maillard @ 2010-04-10 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dirk Hohndel; +Cc: Notmuch list On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:12:47 -0700, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:26:01 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > notmuch is (mostly) not responsible for sending email. However, people > > using the emacs frontend use notmuch to create the reply. > > > > Am I the only one who is sometimes curious as to what mail agents others > > use? Would it be useful to insert a header to notmuch reply analog to: > > > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) > > > > We could reuse the same version string that we use for the release (or > > the git string that was used to build notmuch). I can use this to create > > nice stats :). > > > > No patch yet, just asking if this is a good idea or not. > > I think it's a very good idea. But it should be something that includes > the other components of how you send email... I totally agree with this and Carl's proposition is really what I would want to see. The only problem is: how do you implement a generic solution for all possible backends ? I know a possibility for mail-mode but I do not know how to do this for message-mode. And even If I'd know that's only targeted to GNU Emacs' users. Xavier ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-08 8:26 RFC: User-Agent header Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-08 15:12 ` Dirk Hohndel @ 2010-04-11 22:12 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-12 5:45 ` David Edmondson 2010-04-12 8:30 ` [PATCH] " Sebastian Spaeth 1 sibling, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-11 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Notmuch list After some research, this is what I found/propose: With some simple elisp am I using this User-Agent header now: User-Agent: notmuch version 0.1 (Emacs 23.1.1/i486-pc-linux-gnu) This needs to be done: 1) Add "User-Agent" to the variable "message-required-headers" (it is (optional . User-Agent) by default in message-mode. 2) Message mode will then insert a User-Agent header and fill it with the (local) variable "message-newsreader". This is how I set my message-newsreader now (leading to above string): (setq message-newsreader (concat (substring (shell-command-to-string (concat notmuch-command " --version")) 0 -1) " (Emacs " emacs-version "/" system-configuration ")")) This works fine for composing mails with both "m" (from within notmuch) and "c-x m" from outside notmuch. It won't work with "r" as message mode does not seem to be involved in setting up the headers at all then. (So notmuch-reply.c might just want to also set up the User-Agent header by default). sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-11 22:12 ` Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-12 5:45 ` David Edmondson 2010-04-12 8:30 ` [PATCH] " Sebastian Spaeth 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: David Edmondson @ 2010-04-12 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:12:15 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > After some research, this is what I found/propose: > ... Please make the insertion of User-Agent optional. Some might not want it. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-11 22:12 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-12 5:45 ` David Edmondson @ 2010-04-12 8:30 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-13 17:44 ` Carl Worth 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-12 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Notmuch list OK, final post from me on this issue. This is what I am using in my .emacs now. It does not clutter up the message compose window with a User-Agent header as it is hidden by message mode. It is also not shown by default in the notmuch-show modes but viewing the full headers confirms that it is indeed being send. It works for "c-x m" and "m" in notmuch-show mode, AND it also work for "r"eplies in notmuch-show mode. I put this in the message mode hook because we will then not call the notmuch binary each time we start up emacs, but it will be dynamically be created when message mode is invoked. Not sure if others have a cleverer solution here. ;; set the User-Agent string whenever we invoke message mode (add-hook 'message-mode-hook '(lambda() ;; check if User-Agent is a required header and set it if not (if (not (memq 'User-Agent message-required-mail-headers)) (setq message-required-mail-headers (append message-required-mail-headers '(User-Agent)))) ;; hide the User-Agent header if not already hidden (if (not (memq '"^User-Agent:" message-hidden-headers)) (setq message-hidden-headers (append message-hidden-headers '("^User-Agent:")))) ;; create user agent string (let ((notmuch-user-agent (concat (substring (shell-command-to-string (concat notmuch-command " --version")) 0 -1) " (Emacs " emacs-version "/" system-configuration ")"))) (setq message-newsreader notmuch-user-agent)) )) Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-12 8:30 ` [PATCH] " Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-13 17:44 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-13 22:55 ` Xavier Maillard ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Carl Worth @ 2010-04-13 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 502 bytes --] On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:30:54 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > OK, final post from me on this issue. No, wait! I want more from you. :-) Would you care to put together a solution that does this from within notmuch*.el ? I really want things usable by default without people having to hack up their .emacs files. Of course, we could also easily add a variable to make this not happen, (but that can be added in a follow-on patch by anyone). Thanks, -Carl [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-13 17:44 ` Carl Worth @ 2010-04-13 22:55 ` Xavier Maillard 2010-04-14 7:38 ` [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-14 7:44 ` [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header Sebastian Spaeth 2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Xavier Maillard @ 2010-04-13 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carl Worth, Sebastian Spaeth; +Cc: Notmuch list On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:44:03 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:30:54 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > > OK, final post from me on this issue. > > No, wait! I want more from you. :-) > > Would you care to put together a solution that does this from within > notmuch*.el ? I really want things usable by default without people > having to hack up their .emacs files. +1 > Of course, we could also easily add a variable to make this not happen, > (but that can be added in a follow-on patch by anyone). +1 Xavier ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header 2010-04-13 17:44 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-13 22:55 ` Xavier Maillard @ 2010-04-14 7:38 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-14 7:44 ` David Edmondson 2010-04-14 7:44 ` [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header Sebastian Spaeth 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-14 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Notmuch developer list This adds a function (and a hook) to have notmuch insert a User-Agent header into composed mails (even if invoked from not-notmuch ways, such as with ctrl-x m. This is invariably added for now without the possibility to turn it off, a task left as a homework for others. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> --- emacs/notmuch.el | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el index 517c53a..8a7df15 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch.el @@ -54,6 +54,30 @@ (require 'notmuch-lib) (require 'notmuch-show) +(defun notmuch-set-user-agent-header () + "Sets variables so that message mode inserts a notmuch User-Agent + header into send mails" + ;; check if User-Agent is a 'required' mail header and set it if not + (if (not (memq 'User-Agent message-required-mail-headers)) + (setq message-required-mail-headers + (append message-required-mail-headers '(User-Agent)))) + ;; hide the User-Agent header when composing a mail + (if (not (memq '"^User-Agent:" message-hidden-headers)) + (setq message-hidden-headers + (append message-hidden-headers '("^User-Agent:")))) + ;; create the notmuch user agent string + (let ((notmuch-user-agent (concat + (substring (shell-command-to-string + (concat notmuch-command + " --version")) 0 -1) + " (Emacs " emacs-version "/" + system-configuration ")"))) + (setq message-newsreader notmuch-user-agent))) + +;; set the User-Agent string whenever we invoke message mode +;; TODO: use a variable that allows disabling. +(add-hook 'message-mode-hook 'notmuch-set-user-agent-header) + (defun notmuch-select-tag-with-completion (prompt &rest search-terms) (let ((tag-list (with-output-to-string -- 1.6.3.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header 2010-04-14 7:38 ` [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-14 7:44 ` David Edmondson 2010-04-14 9:52 ` Sebastian Spaeth 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: David Edmondson @ 2010-04-14 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch developer list On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:38:05 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > This adds a function (and a hook) to have notmuch insert a User-Agent header > into composed mails (even if invoked from not-notmuch ways, such as with > ctrl-x m. This is invariably added for now without the possibility to > turn it off, a task left as a homework for others. This really should be done with `define-mail-user-agent' and associated paraphernalia. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header 2010-04-14 7:44 ` David Edmondson @ 2010-04-14 9:52 ` Sebastian Spaeth 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-14 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Edmondson, Notmuch developer list On 2010-04-14, David Edmondson wrote: > This really should be done with `define-mail-user-agent' and associated > paraphernalia. Which might be correct but beyond what I can provide :). So, either we take this and get a followup patch, or someone improves it, or we drop it. Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-13 17:44 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-13 22:55 ` Xavier Maillard 2010-04-14 7:38 ` [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-14 7:44 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-15 19:52 ` Carl Worth 2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-14 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carl Worth, Notmuch list On 2010-04-13, Carl Worth wrote: > > OK, final post from me on this issue. > No, wait! I want more from you. :-) Sigh, they always want more :-) > Would you care to put together a solution that does this from within > notmuch*.el ? I really want things usable by default without people > having to hack up their .emacs files. See the "sister mail" to this thread, in which I simply added the whole shebang to notmuch.el (not using a lambda function). Is that what you had in mind. Mind you, my elisp knowledge borders close to 0, so I would be surprised if I did not botch up things. However, I have tested the patch, and the User-Agent header got inserted. > Of course, we could also easily add a variable to make this not happen, > (but that can be added in a follow-on patch by anyone). Some don't want it, but it cannot be disabled in this patch, so that would indeed need to be a followup patch. This gets now inserted (message mode automatically wrapped the header like this): User-Agent: notmuch version 0.1-107-g553feae (Emacs 23.1.1/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Is that an acceptable format? I would have preferred to not include the "version" string, but notmuch --version spits that out, and it was just easier to leave it in. Is that "version" really needed, BTW? Why can't notmuch --version not just say: notmuch 0.1-107-g553feae Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header 2010-04-14 7:44 ` [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header Sebastian Spaeth @ 2010-04-15 19:52 ` Carl Worth 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Carl Worth @ 2010-04-15 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sebastian Spaeth, Notmuch list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 955 bytes --] On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:44:16 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote: > On 2010-04-13, Carl Worth wrote: > > No, wait! I want more from you. :-) > > Sigh, they always want more :-) Sorry about that. :-) > See the "sister mail" to this thread, in which I simply added the whole > shebang to notmuch.el (not using a lambda function). Is that what you > had in mind. Yes, that looks pretty good. But David has some improvements in mind, this feature was implemented after the 0.2 merge window closed, *and* I've committed to David to not keep messing with the emacs code before merging in his outstanding changes. So I'm going to wait on this for now at least. > Is that "version" really needed, BTW? Why can't notmuch --version not just say: > notmuch 0.1-107-g553feae Good point. I think I was imitating the "git --version" output or something. I can't give any reason for this though. I'll fix this. -Carl [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-15 19:53 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-04-08 8:26 RFC: User-Agent header Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-08 15:12 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-10 2:55 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-10 4:43 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-10 13:16 ` Jameson Rollins 2010-04-10 14:00 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-10 14:45 ` Dirk Hohndel 2010-04-10 14:02 ` Xavier Maillard 2010-04-11 22:12 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-12 5:45 ` David Edmondson 2010-04-12 8:30 ` [PATCH] " Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-13 17:44 ` Carl Worth 2010-04-13 22:55 ` Xavier Maillard 2010-04-14 7:38 ` [PATCH 13/13] notmuch.el: Add a function to insert a notmuch user-agent header Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-14 7:44 ` David Edmondson 2010-04-14 9:52 ` Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-14 7:44 ` [PATCH] RFC: User-Agent header Sebastian Spaeth 2010-04-15 19:52 ` Carl Worth
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/ This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).