From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:47:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r5kgrtcf.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hm8xgfp.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 969 bytes --]
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:29:46 -0400, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> I'm advocating that *only* the "unread" tag ever be automatically
> removed in the emacs UI when doing anything other than explicitly
> removing tags (eg. like just opening a message for viewing, or browsing
> through a thread, etc.). All other tags should only ever be explicitly
> modified by the user.
Understood. Presumably the automatic tag addition would also remain.
> If users want to have special tag manipulation procedures to match their
> needs, then they can easily build the needed functions and bind them to
> whichever keys they wish.
In general I'd agree. The 'advance-and-archive' case is different,
because it's behaviour is bound up in the logic of the function. It's
not easy to just add that in on top with a simple key binding.
In any case, I don't care enough to argue more. Go for it.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-09 14:49 [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive Jameson Rollins
2010-06-09 15:12 ` David Edmondson
2010-06-09 15:25 ` Jameson Rollins
2010-06-09 15:36 ` David Edmondson
2010-06-09 15:55 ` Jameson Rollins
2010-06-09 17:18 ` David Edmondson
2010-06-09 17:29 ` Jameson Rollins
2010-06-09 17:47 ` David Edmondson [this message]
2010-06-09 17:54 ` Carl Worth
2010-06-09 19:07 ` servilio
2010-06-09 19:11 ` Jameson Rollins
2010-06-09 17:50 ` Carl Worth
2010-06-09 18:20 ` Dirk Hohndel
2010-06-09 19:12 ` servilio
2010-06-09 19:20 ` Jameson Rollins
2010-06-09 19:33 ` Carl Worth
2010-06-15 9:25 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2010-06-09 19:04 ` servilio
2010-06-09 19:18 ` Jameson Rollins
2010-06-09 19:55 ` Michal Sojka
2010-06-15 9:21 ` Sebastian Spaeth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r5kgrtcf.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net \
--to=dme@dme.org \
--cc=jrollins@finestructure.net \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).