On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:07:49 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to emphasise the bug is already present in current master (just
> better hidden because of the defaults). Hence this pair of patches
> (unlike the first one I sent privately) are to current master rather
> than to the exclude the series (though they apply there to to modulo the
> minor change you mention).

Ok, I see.  I think we really need to see the rest of that patch series
applied to master, though, so if you could send a version compatible
with [0], and in-reply-to [0], that would awesome.

Thanks again, Mark.

jamie.

[0] id:"1330779918-28024-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"