From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217B4431FBC for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MTawZ5lvNrRB for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9C4431FB6 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:22:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlIaW-0008WC-JS; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:22:00 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 1765 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:21:56 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , notmuch mailing list Subject: Re: emacs compatibility? In-Reply-To: <87eh649npl.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> References: <87eh649npl.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17~rc1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:21:56 -0400 Message-ID: <87r4a35mdn.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:22:09 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > i notice that in the current master, debian/notmuch-emacs.README.Debian > contains the following stanza: > > ------------ > * This package currently works only with emacs 23. Users of > pre-release snapshots of emacs 24 can expect problems. > ------------ > > I'm using notmuch (and notmuch-emacs) 0.16 with emacs24, and i don't > think i'm seeing any such problems. But maybe i'm just lucky and/or > conservative and don't happen to tickle any of the incompatibilities? > > Or is the above README (which is dated from 2011) stale? If so, as a > user i'd appreciate an update that reflect the current expectations of > the notmuch development community about which versions of emacs are > considered well-supported for the upcoming 0.17 release. Yeah, emacs24 is fine with 0.17~pre-whatever. Someone(TM) should update that README. d