From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8466D6DE021E for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 02:40:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.125 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hD8_WOgfM3Ai for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 02:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623AB6DE009A for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 02:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQuPr-0002EQ-I0; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:39:47 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 26156 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:39:34 -0000 From: David Bremner To: David Mazieres expires 2015-09-29 PDT , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Enabling and disabling maildir.synchronize_flags In-Reply-To: <87r3orbqfn.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> References: <87r3orbqfn.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:39:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3n3fu7d.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:40:37 -0000 dm-list-email-notmuch@scs.stanford.edu writes: > It seems that disabling it should simply be safe. But re-enabling, one > risks losing tags, as the next notmuch new will cause old maildir flags > to override the xapian database. So that suggests something like: > > notmuch dump > backup > notmuch config set maildir.synchronize_flags false > # Do I need to run notmuch new here? > notmuch restore < backup Hi David; Sorry about the long delay. I'm not sure I follow the connection between your paragraph above and the the example. The example seems safe, but as you say, disabling synching should bs safe anyway. d