From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: T350 test failures with gnupg-2.1.16
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:20:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r363nrd0.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bmx7l0am.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3303 bytes --]
David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
>>
>>> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> After updating to gnupg 2.1.16, T350-crypto.sh fails in some of the
>>>> signature verification steps with wrong content-length:
>>>>
>>>> T350-crypto: Testing PGP/MIME signature verification and decryption
>>>> PASS emacs delivery of signed message
>>>> FAIL signature verification
>>>> --- T350-crypto.2.expected 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000
>>>> +++ T350-crypto.2.output 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000
>>>> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>>>> "id": 2
>>>> },
>>>> {
>>>> - "content-length": 280,
>>>> + "content-length": 312,
>>>> "content-type": "application/pgp-signature",
>>>
>>> These failures are not duplicated for me in debian sid, also with gpg
>>> 2.1.16. From IRC I believe Marius is running GuixSD.
>>
>> This is correct. Strange that it's not reproducible on Debian. Any tips
>> for how to troubleshoot this further? Is the content-length based on
>> signature only? I'll see if I can extract the raw output somehow.
>
> You could start with the following, from inside tmp.T350-crypto
>
> % grep -R "Subject: test signed message 001" mail
> % ../../devel/printmimestructure < mail/sent/cur/$the_file_matched_by_grep
>
> That will tell us if the mismatch is in the created file or in the later
> parsing.
Thanks for this! It seems the signature is 32 bytes longer in 2.1.16.
../../devel/printmimestructure < mail/sent/cur/1479841188.2873_194073_1.localhost\:2\,S
└┬╴multipart/signed 778 bytes
├─╴text/plain 31 bytes
└─╴application/pgp-signature [signature.asc] 312 bytes
vs...
../../devel/printmimestructure < mail/sent/cur/1479848474.6836_793177_1.localhost\:2\,S
└┬╴multipart/signed 747 bytes
├─╴text/plain 31 bytes
└─╴application/pgp-signature [signature.asc] 280 bytes
The signatures of each email:
2.1.16:
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iLMEAQEIAB0WIQRa6rEfXjPc6HXdt1ttkmEtlORjgQUCWDSVpAAKCRBtkmEtlORj
gf90A/4twA6txofm53BhqVAOUwdQNmA2H/yDhP29k6ctZ+XeTw77VZgrFMERoll7
lG6MEsH4JiMasJoevOohRsNmA9F3cEy5b38+c5KuaUlz5jVAKLZ4e8jkZmw2t8L+
hDbtLt7vzd72as8i9yNfKhf1DqAU9ayCJgXOMN4ql/uZqbWIqQ==
=o1L0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
2.1.15:
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iJwEAQEIAAYFAlg0shoACgkQbZJhLZTkY4H4ewQAoWTNwOtQAH/fwlgkqBuWLoWB
7CrrW3Lj1vEVaTRkaBIFP7NiYTDGZtWP6KCZ7G9HXsyprsg5HtVIp3wl4DHKmK/u
XipG0l3PNkSv9+SuUVxI4E9dj0kTJzNLqZaRYf3kmQJTs/jTyxQCuqPd1JF5kD9e
Nkd1585nFCNQAdNJgIE=
=8npB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
Reading through the ChangeLog, I can't see anything obviously related.
One workaround could be setting an explicit key algorithm instead of
relying on the default. I'll have a go at this.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-22 19:22 T350 test failures with gnupg-2.1.16 Marius Bakke
2016-11-22 19:59 ` David Bremner
2016-11-22 20:12 ` Marius Bakke
2016-11-22 20:36 ` David Bremner
2016-11-22 21:20 ` Marius Bakke [this message]
2016-11-22 20:49 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016-11-22 23:07 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016-11-22 23:20 ` Marius Bakke
2016-11-23 16:41 ` [PATCH] tests: account for varying-size OpenPGP signatures Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016-11-23 16:59 ` David Bremner
2016-11-23 17:58 ` Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016-11-23 17:57 ` [PATCH v2] tests: account for varying-size cryptographic signatures Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2016-11-25 1:27 ` David Bremner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r363nrd0.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me \
--to=mbakke@fastmail.com \
--cc=david@tethera.net \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).