From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016FB6DE1003 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:13:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.115 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.105, RDNS_NONE=0.2, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ehum_Zqa9psn for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:13:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (unknown [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94AAE6DE0B7C for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:12:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFJoP-00080z-5b; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 08:02:33 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 30572 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:02:31 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] crypto: add --try-decrypt=nostash to avoid stashing session keys In-Reply-To: <20171025065203.24403-17-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> References: <20171025065203.24403-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20171025065203.24403-17-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 09:02:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87r2sy8jh4.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 16:13:14 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > + DO NOT USE ``index.try_decrypt=true`` or ``index-only`` > + without considering the security of your index. is index-only a typo there? As a future improvement it would be nice to reduce some of the documentation cut and paste for common options, perhaps with include files? As long as the solution isn't worse than the problem of course. > +test_expect_equal \ > + "$output" \ > + "$expected" > + > + > + > + Is there some reason for all those blank lines?