From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457886DE0F31 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:24:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.029 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.028, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xvGoYd888r0E for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74AB56DE0EB7 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hJmn0-0007PL-Ph; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 18:24:22 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 17859 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 22:24:21 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: add support for adding configure options as Sphinx tags In-Reply-To: <20190319190146.26155-1-jani@nikula.org> References: <20190319190146.26155-1-jani@nikula.org> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:24:21 -0300 Message-ID: <87r29pafl6.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 22:24:25 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > > This is something I wrote two years ago, ISTR David asking about > something like this on IRC, but I've already forgotten what it was > about... I (somewhere) have a patch for configure that generates the appropriate tags. OTOH, the fact the tags can't be used to disable include files (apparently the include is processed first, surprising almost everyone) makes me less enthusiastic about this. Also, I hope soon to migrate notmuch from xapian 1.2-1.4 to xapian 1.4-1.6, so everything will have field processors. d