From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D576431FB6 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:04:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXADTI4V-BSp for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:04:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD03A431FB5 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:04:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (trendnetrouter.phys.columbia.edu [128.59.169.31]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBAG4HI4026643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:04:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PR5SE-0001iB-2Q; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:04:18 -0500 From: Jameson Rollins To: Felipe Contreras , Sebastian Spaeth Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] composing patches In-Reply-To: References: <1291933972-7186-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <877hfi1ql7.fsf@SSpaeth.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:04:14 -0500 Message-ID: <87pqt9ty0x.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:04:21 -0000 --=-=-= On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:35:17 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Why it's not? The emacs UI is not really doing anything on top of > 'notmuch reply'. And if it is, it can very well override that value. > Besides, what about other users (vim)? Why not make the output of > 'notmuch reply' ready to be dumped to sendmail? I think this is a reasonable point. But is there a reason that vim can't fill in the Message-ID and User-Agent fields? Presumably it does when composing new messages, right? That said, if the pre-filling in those fields will help other user agents, then I don't see the binary shouldn't do that. Like you said, other user agents (like emacs) can change them if they see fit. > It seems right now there's a lot of reliance on emacs UI, and gnus. I don't think there's any reliance on gnus. I certainly don't use it. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNAk9/AAoJEO00zqvie6q8q/kP/0lRhb/9mDM03Z1DcjGsAtup R8wf6StBj0UNZ3BVftpoAeNlgOnHSVjti5Smgb0V6MxL2lXpWTxBESre89HcbGma wK4UtI1dg61mejBNjSqgkSqw9nU5xfGFSwWWeIY/szlBbWiNp/5OAgWLAwWuIl59 F5RFqg8fsiiXT7yyJqTiqH7YFmG5va9iCyiO1P1F3OdH7r4wKeuBJeb0GHjAaqFy jk81w+b5IQqcfdvFG7Fnp6FY5M0B4fDDZjox5iD/y6C0TGsyTpLqhWUZ4yEKb+c/ lH04TNLBvilifdi3rRUoYO7H0uabjWt2R/x9RvxFryFm4kz8IlqxzQqd9zXYG4MM NGFkK+wq55tRpYrbXZefNqi1y9LsquAal/fsGR8WksA+cmtj4QzanlAhS8JL4UQg O56c7Ts9rGv+hWEoeaf9SyJmV4yP3z/rkKdd07lCuTUWcoQ/R+7ciSU+nVtg0Ty9 gBiHaHu7hWlJKb1923YZo1fjUU1FpqtmJ3258bIpn6PQ30M+sNnlssI4ffuBsfXy WB2CF6yc8GET+L1/Bai1v35LmMsvLirPHwYfZ/mI4f0Ic93qMiGXWlAKxMyVVRSb bbmK52pNlaihMugbsBHvRo5J8AkNV5YnD4LaAn9SZV2aSQtHoqnHwaVsr3m4qnOk P/NggqK9BDotR0Qx01B6 =vQhw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--