From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7944151F3 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:32:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGDnvFVEr1BA for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:32:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89354151C0 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A1C66E00E2; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:32:18 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6837F66E00C7; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:32:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08C02A4A; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:32:14 -0800 (PST) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Jeremy Nickurak , Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to reply-to-all In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+168~g34b8bac (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:32:11 -0800 Message-ID: <87pqetrcsk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:32:21 -0000 --=-=-= On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:01:30 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > FWIW, I generally prefer reply-all as the default. In my experience, > when a message is sent to a bunch of people, it's usually treated as a > "forum" discussion where everybody wants to be in on everything. Also, > once you've started composing, it's much easier to delete people you > don't want included than to add people who are no longer referenced in > the new buffer at all. That's a good point. I think that maybe people are wanting to protect against the accidental reply to all when you only mean to reply to the sender. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPCid7AAoJEO00zqvie6q89TsP/17ECLjswAkcKCVNsI8ZXjfK fXlwhzlHGfNNwcAuW6nDDBlK3UrZWvUeJ8KLqpm5tAo/3n5OEcyJ7WUcXCtgtwFi P7T+PBQe/rVorJqq5UYTCSl4HN9V0IssoEMgkze3iTGJ2f70AstCRABQRTvCJkjn euiXLAYignFy7cnP+HcOCAbQ7ZdAqsx5F89kl0bHnCjK3CjAXUCWatVeaUTrPNfp eHAHmtVPbpjjI1BIgPz+oclXgTQuEKfH1fPGk/MYaIdDgDZxcucSbH1rXmAdYBbI reBFu/sDc+TLxwGeCXDYeqHK0vaMWeOKkBq5h/eMCCtpbe0CvAy0ShLbLLp7iJzt babIzst+iwusrowKCiWKgxOE1Tdqjv8ncpEd+9jWcUPhpXMMHXgSjXBd2xQwIfEg BNTR6Jy8Jfcw52Dz546vrokQCxPTLLEenZsWTVo+BQZMU2nP28aC+cmksnszETIz /8XcBpT3SZ7luL+laqLJa0KvPTIDM5Tw3UjKSuT/sbdz3QBKgliKP/+qmYCmIwXb ZxFdfka2hgVlf6T5OPOgoq/ZORIbZyvv3G4tObp0lxoR/e+UMNxsvi/FWRjrWvku daWjRRvysj9GsKPJdLG/1bGNCVCmdKixKTeLGItcWpeaF5tjF1etwsk4yRs7K2Fj vZ6pbAptY8o8SyY8FutL =LIwf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--