From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB09431FBD for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:09:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z+gJV0RRtMm8 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C53431FAE for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1ZB0-0008Vp-Oo; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:09:53 +0000 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S1ZB0-0003La-9y; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:09:50 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: David Bremner , notmuch Subject: Re: plans for 0.12 In-Reply-To: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87mx87j8eh.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+202~g31eaf97 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:11:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87pqd2dnez.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 9270ba1601a6b8e65854f5ec060e31d3 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:09:59 -0000 On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:27:02 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > I would like to start a freeze (i.e. merge master to release) for 0.12 > within the next week, say March 1 for an easy to remember date. > > If you have suggestions for things that "should really go in", feel free > to follow up. The main point here is bug fixes, or features which are > there in a kindof half baked way. > > Bug fix wise, I know about > > id:"1330068983-4483-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz" > > This could use some review. > > It has also been some chatter that either (the next iteration of) > > id:"1329296619-7463-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" > > Should go in, or we should revert amdragon's exclude stuff. > > I don't have strong feelings either way, except it is somewhat late in > the day for a large(ish) and complicated series. I agree it is a largish patch set: I think I would err against including it for 0.12 as it has not had a lot of testing (I think only by me). It would also allow people to work out what they wanted emacs to do with the exclude flag. (The notmuch-show.el patch 12/13 needs simple rebasing which I have done but not posted yet.) A temporary revert might be reasonable: alternatively we could just turn off the automatic addition of the exclude tags (deleted and spam) to the config file in notmuch-config so only users who ask for it get it on this release. If it is not reverted then I think patches 1-3 of the latest series id:"1330157204-26094-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" might be worth including. They just add the --no-exclude option to notmuch-count and notmuch-search and are simple (it's one "code" patch, one "man" patch and some tests). I guess my favoured option would just be to disable the automatic addition of exclude tags (ideally with patches 1-3 above, but that is not important). Best wishes Mark > There are several other patch series that look ready from a review point > of view, but I'd rather have them pushed earlier in the release cycle > (or at least I don't see a hurry). For example > > id:"1329490088-8323-2-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com" > id:"1329697590-7404-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu" > > My (tentative) plan is to push those once I have branched for release. > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch