From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D2D431FAF for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:30:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bcey6xqkP9gg for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3552431FAE for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2CA2E50D7E; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B0D2E50DA0; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EE66762; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:30:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Peter Wang , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] test: Add tests for 'config' command In-Reply-To: <1333676886-9835-3-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> References: <1332282698-7951-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> <1333676886-9835-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> <1333676886-9835-3-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+108~g7bdb40c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:30:29 -0700 Message-ID: <87pqbghwmi.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:30:36 -0000 --=-=-= On Thu, Apr 05 2012, Peter Wang wrote: > +test_begin_subtest "Set string value" > +notmuch config set foo.bar baz > +test_expect_equal "$(notmuch config get foo.bar)" "baz" > + > +test_begin_subtest "Set list value" > +notmuch config set foo.list xxx "yyy yyy" "zzz zzz" > +test_expect_equal "$(notmuch config get foo.list)" "\ > +xxx > +yyy yyy > +zzz zzz" I find it slightly strange to use non-existent fields here, but I also don't see that it hurts anything either. At least at the moment. Another option would be to use an existing field, and change it back when you're done. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPg+GWAAoJEO00zqvie6q8l+gP/izGT8F/1300lfRfSjmIJpwC VCjZhAVHtIlFstuaBJ5OeKWH1Dr7nNNY7+pUM07w3Gg3XJpzAlpNomHFYeWCABY/ LyX5KFChPIicui/vlYfCChh28kUHKwge8LdGnE4t/otzvGnWB/M85OQRyN+Sp1I7 9aybvbSkGi6UCBgclPVaO1kb6qC4RuotE6kg4CjAqLeHLzbDUxGIl7QWFH0uL8vD ebIbQMtTALwYo9EpCm1sSFruYWrOid6cLCu8Ne9skRXQj5fq0PsDvOfLPk1ag3TX KJuMvEW4yYS0phCfPfxnzTOWz6XhfT/pW6VV9BKOme23TqJD3HwuJZtZqbmSmJPP WgDUcVw3E5kLxbC8cO6XKkTX/gHKi/BEcgSc+yQIhBmSxj7YuZPB/DSdbmEoHhVR I9fy3eXPsY6lmZUzBMgKWruHCXgsCg9R5pUFydpxz0hyj4vYqDQdfyy2vn28zCAP cWWeQ+hyPShgb1FSL6OEhozdouZYY9yWX5AiWhiVMltAzbVXbDMu5qtGgnM9ZnLR aeoSUtsyiC47g6reIX7HDeG10gxWrs+QrPjF8qZNXJxJ40iUFvnWonVrnvKxpaeO r7ucxcFzVVSqlvV+9FbiuonwaYHeSayl5AiP11wACQQdCKHglQdIiEOXoCR8f4vp xeNvSSC1r2TKl86HPbRu =CB70 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--