From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF21431FBD for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GXWE9RlH--5V for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500E7431FAF for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 12:21:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UBsw6-0000bi-0S; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:21:38 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UBsvW-0005fE-84; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:21:02 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Rainer M Krug Subject: Re: Batch tagging - add id_list as tag possible? In-Reply-To: References: <871ubx7pa8.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+32~g16aa65b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:21:02 -0400 Message-ID: <87ppzh5z9t.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:21:39 -0000 Rainer M Krug writes: > On Saturday, March 2, 2013, David Bremner wrote: >> > It would be great if I could have >> > +%id_list >> > >> > And it would automatically tag my mails with the list I'd? >> >> It should be possible to script that, using e.g. formail to extract the >> list id. > > But this would be done outside the batch tagging - correct? > Yes > I think tagging based on a header would be a powerful and useful feature, > especially for tagging of lists. I don't know about your use case, but I think for most people being able to search on more headers (including e.g. List-Id) would be convenient replacement for such "autotagging". This is something that many people have requested/talked-about, but so far nobody has done the work. d