From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C041E6DE0222
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.017
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[AWL=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
 autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id hj9QQ8YlZOKl for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D9796DE00F5
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)
 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
 id 1ar10A-0004mB-U7; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:29:26 -0400
Received: (nullmailer pid 8795 invoked by uid 1000);
 Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:29:16 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Cc: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] complete
 ghost-on-removal-when-shared-thread-exists
In-Reply-To: <87wpo362er.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <1459445693-3900-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
 <1460166892-29721-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
 <1460166892-29721-7-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
 <87r3ed6l35.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87zit0t0mj.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
 <87wpo362er.fsf@zancas.localnet>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+99~gd93d377 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 07:29:16 -0300
Message-ID: <87potri2rn.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:29:32 -0000

David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:

> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
>
>
>> I don't think this reasoning is sensible.  If the entire thread is
>> deleted, and a new message comes in, it should *not* get the same mesage
>> ID.  ghosts should only exist in the database when other messages point
>> to them.
>>
>> So i'd be fine with killing this entire last test, unless someone can
>> propose a good reason to keep it.
>
> I think I buy your reasoning, but I'd be happy if Austin (who introduced
> ghost messages, and wrote that test, could comment.

I have pushed the series, amended to remove that one test from T530.

d