From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191F66DE0946 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 04:34:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8OmFC9U1i6F for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 04:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E286DE01CE for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 04:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0oN3-0006gy-VM; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 07:33:49 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 27876 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:34:05 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , Tomi Ollila Cc: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: rfc for notmuch remote access script In-Reply-To: <8760oa41s6.fsf@nikula.org> References: <87lgx9ln56.fsf@localhost.localdomain.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <874m3wvjzx.fsf@tethera.net> <8760oa41s6.fsf@nikula.org> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:34:05 -0300 Message-ID: <87pomit6j6.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:34:14 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > > Personally, I prefer a simple script that assumes a certain type of ssh > client configuration. We can typically reference documentation written > by others how to do that, and just say "put that stuff under a Host > notmuch section in ~/.ssh/config". > OK, I misunderstood, and thought you wanted to edit the script after installation. Hence my question about installing into $HOME. I'm not using remote access, and I don't really have opinions about the best way to do it. I do have 2 concerns about the overall idea 1. I worry about the maintenance burden of extra code ./configure 2. I worry about promoting remote-notmuch for non-experts when the situation with gpg seems quite broken, at least for people not willing to store private key material on the server.