From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDBE6DE0119 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:57:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.011] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1lblLJj7Wvb for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:57:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9BBF6DE0B14 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:57:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (ool-6c3a0662.static.optonline.net [108.58.6.98]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 694B3F99E; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:57:49 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE0FA2075D; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:13:12 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Tomi Ollila , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH] cli/help: give a hint about notmuch-emacs-mua In-Reply-To: References: <20171026212751.4459-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <87k1y85mza.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:13:12 -0500 Message-ID: <87po7z4zyf.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:57:52 -0000 On Thu 2017-11-30 11:08:05 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30 2017, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >> On Thu 2017-10-26 18:27:51 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> "notmuch help" doesn't mention "notmuch-emacs-mua" even though we >>> support it through the try_external_command() mechanism. >>> >>> In addition, "notmuch help emacs-mua" doesn't work, even though we >>> ship the appropriate manpage. >>> >>> This changeset fixes both of these problems. >> >> Ping! i don't think this patch is complex or objectionable. Can it be >> merged? > > it may (*) look like we don't have #if WITH_EMACS (**) cpp macros defined ??? > > Tomi > > (*) did not check... > > (**) this is emacs-specific stull, less generic that other hints (if that > matters) ... > > Sorry to cause confusion... confusion is right! i don't understand what you're saying, sorry. are you suggesting a different change somehow? Want to propose a different patch? --dkg