From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tomasn@posteo.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288386DE1351
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:23:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.877
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.544, 
 DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id KgUSRlcxn4LJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1300F6DE134D
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) 
 by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B334320EA7
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:23:19 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017;
 t=1513898600; bh=bRdYHHe4iuG8+pza7deLcGsEnftiOCS5Yx8zfz+uOb8=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From;
 b=fRqzEYj+20IY2C4JZ1810DYdxnXvVBrG4gVI8uN/B4/S08AxeH0KmMbAXUpBdw4J/
 9NoNh8W6nDR7tO07bGyVS0NBaRnvMWj8yyh6t1yY41cEGdqY/J1kmZ614KPRjMBgui
 jszKXPTZeJtXpHon6Ko8q9IKqluBLXmkJIq26Yz40XyNbB0LG55V+h0GxkZ/tjiXt5
 mR3XAfZ+jTr4ZN7ZcgsEJp8+UVWe1LdkRf2wJbH2pnVdeoJOGQe9DOR82vsAxZVo66
 uUy8guz9LYXlm3IoQuSMhlcy93ehuVYTfABt+MdZMFTDrASTLNnPJ0H2tChnR47vCw
 CVIGBJC7aPzYg==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3z2nkZ0q3Sz9rxG;
 Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:23:18 +0100 (CET)
From: Tomas Nordin <tomasn@posteo.net>
To: Alex Abdo <alex@alexabdo.com>
Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: Notmuch Emacs: tab completion for tags in Fcc:
In-Reply-To: <64A30152-BC3B-4104-98E4-E432F5F20BF9@alexabdo.com>
References: <1937B10E-68A6-4F49-9C9C-7AB61C196891@alexabdo.com>
 <873744xjh7.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 <87efnokmit.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
 <87wp1fwzfi.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 <64A30152-BC3B-4104-98E4-E432F5F20BF9@alexabdo.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:23:17 +0100
Message-ID: <87po77vf6i.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:23:29 -0000

Alex Abdo <alex@alexabdo.com> writes:

> dkg explained my thinking accurately. I don=E2=80=99t personally use the =
Fcc header routinely to change where sent mail is stored, but I do frequent=
ly use it to tag outgoing mail. And yes, you can add =E2=80=9C+sent -inbox=
=E2=80=9D to the header. I set my Fcc header by default to include =E2=80=
=9C-inbox -unread=E2=80=9D, but when adding other tags, it would be nice to=
 be able to take advantage of tab completion.

Ok, I understand now. I never knew about that feature, now I might start
using it, the tagging that is. And yes, then tab completion could be
nice.