From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79276DE1699 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:21:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.019 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JNlDjjuNJc2D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:21:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C376DE1693 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:21:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C0ECF99D; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:21:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE24C20315; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:02:58 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: "W. Trevor King" Cc: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Gmane vs. Mail Archive notmuch-report config (was: [PATCH] move more http -> https) In-Reply-To: <20180215185629.GC26497@valgrind.us> References: <20180215160140.21027-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20180215185629.GC26497@valgrind.us> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:02:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87po56nhql.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:21:20 -0000 On Thu 2018-02-15 10:56:29 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> - "message-url": "http://mid.gmane.org/{message-id}" >> + "message-url": "https://mid.gmane.org/{message-id}" > > I was wondering whether it made sense to change these to something > else with Gmane down. But it appears that Gmane is back up, possibly > since ~2016-09-14 [1]). The current notmuch-report output [2] is > linking to the Mail Archive though (e.g. [3]) and not to Gmane > (e.g. [4]). Perhaps we want to revert 2d6500a0 (change mid link to > mail-archive.com, 2017-03-19) and go back to Gmane? Or use one of the > other notmuch-based archives that has been floating around on the list > recently? while i'm game to reconsider this (and clearly my work on https://nmbug.notmuchmail.org/btsmail is intended for a future replacement), i don't want to block the proposed patch from landing. what did you think of the rest of the patch? :) --dkg