From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38EF6DE1075 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.662 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.662, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2qjfRTl1X_Zf for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68226DE0F7A for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:27:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: 92.169.116.19 Received: from bababa (lfbn-1-4117-19.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.116.19]) (Authenticated sender: pierre@atlas.engineer) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20C431BF20F; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:27:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Reply inline in notmuch-show buffer, "mu4e-conversation style" In-Reply-To: References: <877ecvb0q7.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <877ecvm05y.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tvffqwp0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a7gyb06w.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9zm9ix2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:27:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnpu9ej1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:27:20 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Edmondson writes: > Yes. My argument was not that we shouldn't have this, just that I wonder > if it results in a good workflow for people who are not using > notmuch/mu4e/gmail (or any other client that shares the same kind of > thread view). With about 1 year of experience using mu4e-conversation, I found that it works really well, actually better in most cases since it does not "pollute" emails with forgotten citations. Most people use Gmail or clients that support threading, in which case this= is really a good fit. But really if we think about the workflow of "most people", then most of the time citations are ignored (e.g. top-posting) and just pollute the rest of the emails. In those cases (the majority?) a non-threaded workflow does not really work I think. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlyt7zIACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH+oAwf/cdnTDwlaDavfeYChV5mlh9Y69J/VWaGGaFaLv07qHWrGySv/+L3BJuZV lOGGYpEuevBYCHzf9wxvuNQAmUu94bi44fGfKv/PsV2qD1l/Dwoe7mA800jU7aWQ sFGpEu5S/Utk4/tP5tOOUzaxxpTumgADy29F29CvDM70y68gwLO+uxsJddrSgJ3o XC7xN9TEalxa6NPKTGQgXsITP2G/GiXlNAU0kxROkVs+W1wzaiqxnASBOs64g1Vg 2ob3Ch6Xjq7wogf0/O8PXoem7gaSAxyTAfmA1y0UPhiqmdlqqMuU1juiw6mt5c0V SmJ9duYzWl31HlRnRN2GxZak84fdBQ== =VRsv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--