From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E3A429E25 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:16:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJMDEDGYeI5v for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:16:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC62431FD0 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:16:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from 121-73-77-183.cable.telstraclear.net ([121.73.77.183] helo=narsil) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbS2J-0002Cr-2P; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:16:55 +0000 Received: by narsil (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CF9E520589; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:16:51 +1300 (NZDT) From: Michael Hudson-Doyle To: David Bremner , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: More ideas about logging. In-Reply-To: <87obv9i7y3.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87obv9i7y3.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:16:51 +1300 Message-ID: <87obv9vvdo.fsf@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Olly Betts X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:16:57 -0000 On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:09:08 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Various discussions (mostly on IRC) from my jlog proposal, and a from > Thomas's mtime > (id:"1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net") proposal > got me thinking. So let me know what you think about the following. > > The goal here is to log tag adds and deletes (including those implicit > in message deletion) to facilitate tag synchonization. It's a tangent, but would this sort of thing allow a "undo last tagging operation" command in emacs? Cheers, mwh