From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF03D6DE012F for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 03:16:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.82 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W7ouh-8LjJaU for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 03:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB756DE00C8 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 03:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a66so22513205wme.0 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=zx6MR5bombon4brTI5h1GYaWLReBxvMOSDIqKz17158=; b=MsPVDXl+Y7yeZAJeBckgbGuiEwZAzOaDCqnz5W4ZgEhzjkzuqvhbz2ko5JSQEw3RTN Dp9sl0o8lnzb7r1VI38k2NQPzKsVW6lBTEeEqyz9ApJnU3uif43g9h5bmrjErmnTV2oc elUrOSUH9sd2ohMM9fbH6Vqh6XnPsHrHDfVz8sKj1i0iUpo3AsfjesrwxuazGI0wCQrZ Igo2f+95CN9xdB2nqbXQipMSv1RJZEEyEUsMDySLiSgDjyKF88OZ1asJHBvrKulG8eXw UZqTv1tWHS8yyH4SQuevC4m27pm42BFdOwELYOpjJb7GtZggVoPEj0nl+AJZz83ahA5U dO5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=zx6MR5bombon4brTI5h1GYaWLReBxvMOSDIqKz17158=; b=nJwV/hgyhSomSQf7y3tObzlJIrPzMic+7szCpYHkfkHWGs5235pEWKqxqMUeyiBOvi NwA7S2eTbMjtE8gVUXWdoRKv09Pbbj0QeKE/43iXFYF2IYROnoutiSyc2PBE31oa4P03 K7UCX800geQkvu7OD0rRjeu0nygC70TH4DbMEt4nav9L/0YQqeCiYBqIIFEtmPynEdZ/ cn8lqMGWbCAtcW2/QqZ2FUBfkvAdxG5+jfzoTx7mFq0pusJRKiM8yyCakaIzMYrAt0b0 xaJS1NY67KwGUSqq5/BKnXXpV97GmQNVA9Cq4+cE/9d7nwmnnA8yC/As5E40IoOGhKFo RQVg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI2oyexv6tGmVjO63D3Tg59KjTXvbflWCEBV277OyYKJL8jmNOOvYYFTwjMQt/jkA== X-Received: by 10.28.211.142 with SMTP id k136mr32356208wmg.29.1467368169661; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cable-146-255-131-70.dynamic.telemach.ba. [146.255.131.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i14sm4213609wmf.13.2016.07.01.03.16.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:16:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Sanel Zukan To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Issue with verifying cleartext signed messages User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:16:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87oa6hbr4o.fsf@darkstar.example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 04:35:16 -0700 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 10:16:20 -0000 Hi, I'm using epa-verify-cleartext-in-region to verify cleartext signed messages and noticed it will sometimes fail with notmuch, especially when target mail message is part of longer thread. For example, when signed mail is first in thread, body will look like: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- and epa-verify-cleartext-in-region will correctly capture and verify it. However, when the message is second or third in thread, notmuch will append spaces in front of it, making it looks like this: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- epa-verify-cleartext-in-region will fail here with: "Invalid cleartext signed message". Error is reproducible - copy the body of message with signature in new buffer, remove starting spaces and epa-verify-cleartext-in-region will work. Any idea how to solve this? Or even better, is it possible to display messages flat, without tree view. If you can, please CC me with reply as I'm not member of this list. Thanks in advace. Best, Sanel