From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BD36DE17CA for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 03:54:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xFUgFvLj3Rug for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 03:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E5C6DE17AD for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 03:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1chxOu-0000CX-5g; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 06:54:04 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 16212 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:54:40 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: fix tests for content-disposition In-Reply-To: <1485691246-19942-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <20170128122130.2935-2-jani@nikula.org> <1485691246-19942-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 07:54:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87o9xpyxof.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:54:44 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > This fixes all tests for the recent addition of content-disposition to > the structured format outputs of notmuch-show. > --- > > Since Jani added the content-disposition as I wanted to use it from emacs (thanks Jani!) > I thought I should fix the tests. > > I don't know if it should be folded in to the main patch or applied > separately. Either is fine with me. Unfortunately this does not apply since 75bb23f74874e3820b0295d0a618045fc5f33417