From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020B46DE0C19 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 23:03:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.009] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6LZAASk6m_v for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 23:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223A76DE0B2F for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 23:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (ool-6c3a0662.static.optonline.net [108.58.6.98]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96635F99A; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 02:03:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2BE091FF90; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 02:03:05 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Jameson Graef Rollins , David Bremner , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/21] crypto: Test restore of cleartext index from stashed session keys In-Reply-To: <87shcneypv.fsf@ligo.caltech.edu> References: <20171130085946.11332-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20171130085946.11332-7-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <877eu2ue89.fsf@tethera.net> <87shcneypv.fsf@ligo.caltech.edu> Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 02:03:05 -0500 Message-ID: <87o9n91z2u.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 07:03:11 -0000 On Thu 2017-12-07 00:20:12 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04 2017, David Bremner wrote: >> Pushed patches 1 to 6. I seem to recall 7 and 8 basically adressed >> concerns/suggestions Jamie had, so I'm hoping he can have a quick look >> at those. > > Yes, this new series is great and definitely addresses all my concerns. > I'm stoked to see that the first part of it has been pushed, and looking > forward to the full series! > > This is really great progress, Daniel. Thanks for pushing on this. Thanks for the review! I've just pushed v3 of what remains of this series, which is basically the same as the remaining patches here, with a couple minor cleanups. you can find it starting at id:20171208062404.17269-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net --dkg