From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id r6CJOi16rF76LQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 May 2020 19:36:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 8MwcOjd6rF7rLQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 May 2020 19:36:23 +0000 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B032D942F7C for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 19:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0036DE13AE; Fri, 1 May 2020 12:36:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9aJe_yT4azv; Fri, 1 May 2020 12:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170906DE0F84; Fri, 1 May 2020 12:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B006DE0F84 for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 12:36:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5a9gMYvL2sET for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 12:36:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Greylist: delayed 334 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at arlo; Fri, 01 May 2020 12:36:07 PDT Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C78426DE0F82 for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 12:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4A15C03DE for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:30:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 May 2020 15:30:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm3; bh=/nnfsXM1AWH6YsbQFfKU8x/v88TVi1SX/1et6i+xZ94=; b=MuwuBeTe FS2FmrCL8sE0Oi0J2TPyGr/wImGbmQXbxKy72IvmMmotyL5TAbrh/18uS0jL9P+s fRnk9sollNsBnASyj9ddaaXS3sGRnvUWBmPFn0mmmeuL9bp4J+ijxUp+Nt2mqYGN n3SLlLz9MM2ILxaw5NJOW05GKK9P4DZCk0qnRJjuUeugNNQDdmKrk1g+UYp0HBM8 2fCghkRLa8swopA7ptKfg+mK9qboEHTLwUi552AmqfHHqwZq9YiPYVgm9LgccJlU KUFSMOdiXzuAC+8rrPG2b28YrxOy9vRanx9KJEEdTLdeXaKPa9Mizwu+V2kiCwqW q99MO6OPBzJbvw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=/nnfsXM1AWH6YsbQFfKU8x/v88TVi 1SX/1et6i+xZ94=; b=Ow7iT+fikvWKsabRrV/MXISjCto2r3flbntJa1+1cB3Bv DKeBv3NgRELKz/PodroVd73biCPC0hfdhKjGadrZRRjqVWJ3XEPmsCv823rwY1kn MxkSVxQhqcgAzs3Yskvja794z6WdnmVq4+qVLHxyyp7+udJPtBWoRKxRYVInpuTb 5+F0SfB+arx7nvfSf99H0kR+uC9n46K/nCtZ5ye2hntS/jRMxRuKxNfXLh29wC3x URtbe8blN6MG3OR4y9YKQXQ7kq0Ki1g2Egjwm8I8+RqKYvDHtYBsK292bqwovekx Qpy3ymZmEnN8XeUek8A/xGd1ELwPXKi4NRtNCifbw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrieejgddufeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkgggtsehttdertddttd dtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcuhghhihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphif hhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleelgeejhedvheeghefgfe egvdfhvdefffefheejtdegfeehffeitdefteejueehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtth honhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: From: Sean Whitton To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: notmuch and mailing lists Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 12:30:28 -0700 Message-ID: <87o8r74fmz.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org Sender: "notmuch" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 1.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=spwhitton.name header.s=fm3 header.b=MuwuBeTe; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Ow7iT+fi; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 50.126.95.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [1.49 / 13.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.46797847114729]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[notmuchmail.org:email]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[50.126.95.6:server fail]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 27017(-0.18), country: US(-0.00), ip: 50.126.95.6(-0.47)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[notmuch@notmuchmail.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MX_INVALID(1.00)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[50.126.95.6:from]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[spwhitton.name]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[spwhitton.name:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[spwhitton.name:-,messagingengine.com:-]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:27017, ipnet:50.126.64.0/18, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[spwhitton@spwhitton.name,notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9] X-TUID: 7nmVyu0XuSFU Hello, I was wondering whether anyone who previously read mailing lists via NNTP has stopped doing this after starting to use notmuch. I've not yet used NNTP to read mailing lists myself, but I think there are limitations to the way I currently read lists, and was wondering whether it is worth exploring the NNTP approach, or trying to come up with notmuch-based workflow improvements. Kindly CC me on replies. -- Sean Whitton